Yes this needs a change . They have all opportunity to make money even though they alllow to use heros just for war . It's like you are upgrading a troop in lab , you won't be able to use that troops while it's been upgraded. Doesn't make any sense .
Please make it available for war ! Makes the game more interesting !! SIGNED
Signed Toooo
Exactly. And if you would rather not have to deal with the crappy parts of playing this FTP mobile game, you're more than invited to spend money to skip itOriginally Posted by SickofTypinginUserNames
Maybe using upgrading heroes in war is a good idea in a paid subscription game. Or if they raise gem costs and/or prices. I don't want to see either of those things. Has that argument been brought up before? I feel like it has...
Last edited by Tiler; March 27th, 2017 at 01:39 PM.
Cloud Control - Why are clouds so terrible, and what are the possible ways to get rid of them?
Signed, This is the Best Idea, AS a TH9 AQ is Leveling Upto Lvl 30 And BK is Leveling Up to Lvl 30 too so the time consuming on the Heroes Upgrade is too long and sitting while heroes are upgrading make your war stars less while you are a th9 clasher.
So what do you want them to cost gems instead?
The game can't be free, so they're going to have to make something cost gems.
I'm not going to read all 455 pages of this to find out why this hasn't been done yet, but it seems like a no-brainer to me!
It hasn't been done because SuperCell make a lot of their revenue from people gemming their heroes to get back into war.
So to have this be "free" they'd have to add a cost somewhere else.
So it's not going to happen.
5000 people writing
/signed
isn't going to change that.
4500 posts so far and not one credible suggestion for something that could cost gems that would work
not one (well that I have seen, let's be fair, there's only so many pages of //signed anyone can look at)
Lies. I've posted several, haha, as have you, I think. But I'm happy to post some suggestions that I'm sure the community would like...
Longer hero upgrade times, longer structure upgrade times, higher gem costs, longer army training times, longer regen times, no more resource packs, no more gem gifting and turning this into a subscription based game.
Any takers?
There's still nothing there that comes CLOSE to the gems this brings in, and you know it
Or if it does, they're horribly unfair. (or vanishingly unlikely, like making it subscription based)
Remember this isn't 4500 post of coming up with a different place to put these costs
It's 4500 posts of "this freemium game wants me to pay gems to play how I want"
Wah
Wah
Wah
//signed
Last edited by PhilISuppose; March 30th, 2017 at 10:39 PM.
Haha, no, those weren't meant to be separate ideas, that was one big idea to try to mitigate the losses SC would suffer. Combine all of those. Though you may be right, it may still not be close.There's still nothing there that comes CLOSE to the gems this brings in, and you know it
Or if it does, they're horribly unfair. (or vanishingly unlikely, like making it subscription based)
Remember this isn't 4500 post of coming up with a different place to put these costs
It's 4500 posts of "this freemium game wants me to pay gems to play how I want"
Wah
Wah
Wah
//signed
Cloud Control - Why are clouds so terrible, and what are the possible ways to get rid of them?
