3 Not-so-new ideas that should be implemented already please :)

[Caguggenmos]

If L3 Pekkas were fine when TH10 only had access to L4 Pekkas, there's no need for the L4 Pekka to be available at TH9.
If you want L4 pekkas so bad, upgrade to TH10. Come enjoy the loot!

(My) argument certainly isn't to make it so all th 9's can 2-star th10's; though that might be the goal of other people. I just think that th10 is already so top-heavy, moving lvl 4 pekkas down to th 9 would just help balance the system a little bit. And because th10's still get lvl 5 pekkas, I'm sure they'll still be plenty happy with the superior troop. Balance is the real goal, not really stars.

Nice quip on the th10 loot. I actually laughed a little ha.

[Denrochee]

So you think because TH10s got a better tesla, TH9s deserve a better Pekka to negate that?
Why do you think TH9s ought to be able to attack TH10s for two stars?

I still haven't been convinced.
If L3 Pekkas were fine when TH10 only had access to L4 Pekkas, there's no need for the L4 Pekka to be available at TH9.
If you want L4 pekkas so bad, upgrade to TH10. Come enjoy the loot!

Yes, considering TH10s can easily 3 star TH 9's I do think a well executed attack should be able to 2 star a TH10 with the right (or wrong) base layout. the Lv 5 pekkas dont enter into this equation at all, but since you keep talking about it, tell me how much sense it makes that TH8 gets L3, TH9 gets L3 and TH10 gets L4&5?

Before the tesla upgrade TH9s could 2 star TH10s with a ground attack, now they cannot if the base is well upgraded. My point is that if Lv4 Pekka get hit by those Lv8 teslas they will still be smashed, and without Freeze spells we have no chance against single target infernos or well placed teslas.

My main question is why does it make sense to you to have Lv 3 available at TH8&9 then 4&5 at TH10?

[PhilISuppose]

Yes, considering TH10s can easily 3 star TH 9's I do think a well executed attack should be able to 2 star a TH10 with the right (or wrong) base layout. the Lv 5 pekkas dont enter into this equation at all, but since you keep talking about it, tell me how much sense it makes that TH8 gets L3, TH9 gets L3 and TH10 gets L4&5?

Before the tesla upgrade TH9s could 2 star TH10s with a ground attack, now they cannot if the base is well upgraded. My point is that if Lv4 Pekka get hit by those Lv8 teslas they will still be smashed, and without Freeze spells we have no chance against single target infernos or well placed teslas.

My main question is why does it make sense to you to have Lv 3 available at TH8&9 then 4&5 at TH10?

It made sense when there was only L3 and L4 pekkas.
TH8 got L3
TH9 got L3
TH10 got L4
No one was saying 'TH9 need L4 pekkas, fix this immediately!

The creation of L5 pekkas didn't suddenly change it so that TH9 deserve L4 pekkas.

[PhilISuppose]

Nice quip on the th10 loot. I actually laughed a little ha.

Yeah
Point was sort of that TH10 suffer enough, give us SOME goodies!!!

[Caguggenmos]

Thread has kind of devolved into only talking about pekkas haha. perhaps i should have made that #1

[cocoasmiles]

Love the post and couldn't agree more espically with the pekka and reason it is no longer good enough at th 9 simple lvl3 pekka available at th 8 then skip th9 go to th10 just to get 4 then oh yeah lets make lvl 5 th 10 also reason th 10 should not worry about th 9 with lvl 4 pekka simple they had to make a lvl 5 for th 10 just to attack another th 10 so obviously lvl4 is not good enough on th10 but It would make th9 vs th9 battles better thanks for your time

[EmeraldRange]

I completely agree with the first two suggestions, but have no right to have an opinion on the third as I barely use pekkas

[Caguggenmos]

I've been reading a few threads on the forums that the new christmas update will have some features that players have been asking about for AGES. Here's to hoping that these ideas made the list!!!!!

[clannis]

I've been reading a few threads on the forums that the new christmas update will have some features that players have been asking about for AGES. Here's to hoping that these ideas made the list!!!!!

I hope so too. These are some obvious inconveniences in the game I would like to see changed as well.
Personally i believe that players should only be able to make a clan when they have at least 5 members or so. Perhaps Supercell could lift clans that have less then 5 members as well, most of the one clan players have quit playing the game anyway. This will also help other clans in recruiting new members.

[Caguggenmos]

Personally i believe that players should only be able to make a clan when they have at least 5 members or so. Perhaps Supercell could lift clans that have less then 5 members as well, most of the one clan players have quit playing the game anyway. This will also help other clans in recruiting new members.

I actually suggested a (yearly) "cleanse" awhile back that supercell could do to reduce the amount of these nonsense clans throughout the game. But it wasn't met with a lot of positive feedback. I think just removing clans with Under 5 people in them on a yearly basis would clean up the clutter a TON. And if a clan with 4 people in it is ACTUALLY active (very unlikely), then they can just remake the silly thing at practically no cost. It's not like making clans is expensive by any stretch of the imagination.

However, since this solution appears to be off the table, Organizing clans in the search according to trophy count is the obvious solution. I'm shocked it hasn't already been done.