Gem boxes fair game in battle!

[Maldives69]

I think that when you attack someone and they haven't got there 25 gems from there box you should be able to have it instead!
Cheeky little earner, can this be done?

[BrianHotshot]

This won't work......imagine how angry players will be if a gem box that spawned when they were inactive got stolen.

[TheGamers]

great idea just maybe you only get 5 gems instead of 25 and the player who it spawned to got 20 gems

[AxionXD]

Supercell will never give the player the ability to earn an unlimited amount of free gems. Not while the game is immensely popular and profitable.

[Mallan]

I think that when you attack someone and they haven't got there 25 gems from there box you should be able to have it instead!
Cheeky little earner, can this be done?

I don't see how this would be allowed. You might as well start a landscaping Clan. Cause you can get Gems from Trees and rocks as well.

[dahimi]

Quit suggesting this. Supercell isn't stupid. They aren't going to be tricked into giving players and endless supply of raidable gems. Give it up.

[honeycuttfd]

i brought this up in my clan and they liked it.. good idea! not our fault you werent on in time to collect your box, and when im searching for a battle i see alot just sitting in the corner...!! i got 5 you get 20.

great idea just maybe you only get 5 gems instead of 25 and the player who it spawned to got 20 gems

[HiFliya]

i brought this up in my clan and they liked it.. good idea! not our fault you werent on in time to collect your box, and when im searching for a battle i see alot just sitting in the corner...!! i got 5 you get 20.

now what if you have all builders busy because of an upgrade spree? people will still be angry that they lost 5 gems, especially if this could be done over and over because the person didnt provide a shield...

[TheGamers]

the first person to attack get five gems only

[Scottd]

the first person to attack get five gems only

This wouldn't be a bad idea to getting it.