Loot Changer:Remove shield when TH is destroyed?

[Jacko2130]

Just want opinions, Im doing walls atm but i know when my storages were full first thing i did was leave th out for shield.

And 95% of the time it worked, just wondering if peeps feel the same way.No more hiding your full storages away using a free shield.

Couple reasons why i think its good

1)it forces players to put there defence to the test instead of always being protected from a shield because of th snipers giving defenders a free shield.

2)your more likely to find those bases with full storages that rely on th snipers to shield them from pesky farmers.

If youve played other games similar to Clash youll know that a few of em only give 30 min shields when your townhall is sniped.This can be a real dramatic game changer imo.

Players with full storages are being taken out of the que because a th sniper has given them a free shield.just think because im sure youve done it, how many times has someone th sniped u when youve had full storages?

Good idea?

Thanks

Posts by users

Posted by Dirty Trickster
I think its a great idea.

Less shields = more available loot. It's simple
(Couldnt have said it better myself)

Posted by bean counter
The fact that *losing* is the best defense in the game is stupid. If they did implement then they would need to cut the percentage for a shield lower. Like 30% instead of 40%.

[Geronimosemiro]

First of all how is putting your TH outside cheap shielding?

This idea is ridiculous. So even if you don't destroy the TH without sniping there is no shield?

Think before posting.

[VincentVegas]

Just want opinions, Im doing walls atm but i know when my storages were full first thing i did was leave th out for shield.

And 95% of the time it worked, just wondering if peeps feel the same way.No more hiding your full storages away using cheap shield.

Good idea?

Thanks

No its a bad idea.

The perceived issue with loot has never been anything to do with TH outside.

How do you distinguish between a TH that has been destroyed normally and one that was an easy snipe?

[Jacko2130]

Destroying townhall still gives a star, but u get no shield with it.does that make sense?

[Jacko2130]

No its a bad idea.

The perceived issue with loot has never been anything to do with TH outside.

How do you distinguish between a TH that has been destroyed normally and one that was an easy snipe?

Theres actually a few games similar to coc on the market that only give 30 min shields when the th is destroyed.i think its a good idea.

[sj74]

Destroying townhall still gives a star, but u get no shield with it.does that make sense?

I have had a few people attack me when I'm after trophies and get my TH (centred) but not get 40%. I would have been pretty P***ed off if I hadn't got a shield too.

[GoWiWi]

Just want opinions, Im doing walls atm but i know when my storages were full first thing i did was leave th out for shield.

And 95% of the time it worked, just wondering if peeps feel the same way.No more hiding your full storages away using cheap shield.

Good idea?

Thanks

In short,



The idea I feel is completely horrible.

[Jacko2130]

First of all how is putting your TH outside cheap shielding?

This idea is ridiculous. So even if you don't destroy the TH without sniping there is no shield?

Think before posting.

Yup thats exactly what im saying, destroying the townhall still gives u a star, but no shield.

You say its ridiculous yet give no reason as to why.would like to hear read more into why you hi k its a bad idea.

[VincentVegas]

Theres actually a few games similar to coc on the market that only give 30 min shields when the th is destroyed.i think its a good idea.

First you suggest no shield if TH is destroyed and now you suggest 30 minute shield if TH is destroyed?

So if I go to sleep for 8hrs I have the potential of losing 16 defences?

I dont think you have thought this through and are now adding bad points from CoC clones as solutions to what exactly?

[MehranJ]

Why is this thread 5 starred??!!