Vote to kick out leaders!!

[TheMan131505]

Any of you Clashers know there is nothing more annoying than unfair clan war opponents, and inactive leaders. I have a solution for the latter one.

I think that an inactive leader can destroy a clan. People don't want to leave to make a new clan because all of their war stats will be lost which is something I like to keep. If 4 co-leaders want to kick out a leader for being bad or any reason they should be able to do it at anytime. If there are 4 troll co-leaders then the leader did a bad job of picking his co-leaders.

If a leader is inactive for a whole league session there should be an option for only 2 co-leaders to have to vote him out. Having to wait for the leader to be inactive for a league session would also prevent greedy co-leaders from giving him the boot. If a leader is kicked from the clan then all the other members, elders, and co-leaders should have 2 days to vote for the new leader.

The same thing should be available for elders to demote co-leaders at anytime if they are abusing their powers. If at least 5 elders vote to demote a co-leader then they should be demoted.

This will make leaders have to really trust their co-leaders and elder to a lesser extent. It will also keep a clan active and in check.

Comment if you like it keep mean comments to yourself and CLASH ON!!!

[OmniShade]

I love this idea. I too have an inactive leader and I don't wanna leave my clan and start over because that's a lot of work and to build a clan back up is hard. I really like this option for a number of co-leaders to kick a leader and same for co-leaders to be demoted. I've been looking for someone who thinks this😂😂😂! Good job!

[Joshokitty]

I'm not voting for this poll because all of them are incorrect in my view. I agree with the title but not just Co-Leaders vote for the kicking of the leader, but at least 50% should have to vote to kick the leader out.

Although this idea could immensely be abused.

[Hardwire]

"Comment if you like it keep mean comments to yourself and CLASH ON!!!"

Lol....so basically you only want to read comments of people that agree with you.....just quit the clan if you don't like your leader or if they war too much, there smart guy

[rwelshjr]

I can understand there will be many reluctant to do this for a variety of reasons and sympathize with them for the conflicts they will feel. But I still think the best solution if the leader is failing you is to just move on and take with you anyone else that feels the same way. Its not perfect, even lots wrong with it, but still the best option.

[John051500]

I believe that the whole clan should be able to vote and you not only need a majority vote, but a 75% vote to kick the leader .

[Brenn]

I believe that the whole clan should be able to vote and you not only need a majority vote, but a 75% vote to kick the leader .

So I could bring 5 people with me and clean up some of the dead 1-person clans?

[AxionXD]

Clans are not a democracy or a republic. Its a dictatorship. At best its an oligarchy. Either accept it or move on. The leader created the clan, you cannot vote that away.

[Warble]

I don't like the idea of allowing cou d'etats, but I would say an leader going inactive is a problem. Another phone game I used to play had a good solution. If the leader doesn't log in for two weeks he is automatically kicked and the clan votes for a new leader.

[Aldoofbanga]

I would say usually no, but if all coleaders could agree then yes. Another option, which might be simpler, is if SC implements some features like

- Auto delete inactive clans after time period
- Auto demote clan leader after inactive for time period