New way to upgrade heroes - best idea ever

[cnascime]

Those of us that already know how to farm and flatten bases for trophies don't require spells and heros. These are perks and add-ons.

Example, when I am farming for elixir I refrain from using spells. When I farm for de I refrain from using dark units. Also your heros require rest time between raids, therefore you don't get to use them for every raid anyhow.

All the above questions you raised are moot points and are not questions we all ask.

I find it annoying that players ask SC to make changes that only cater to their inability to play the game as it was meant to be played. In other words, make things easier for those that don't understand how to play the game properly.

I see your point man. I myself don't really NEED the heroes to barch at crystal 1, but they sure help me a lot when I'm trying to get 50% on a base. On the other hand, if you're a high level player you will know that attacking in clan wars without the heroes is really bad, specially if you're using gowiwi or gowipe. So what's the option? Attack lower town halls? That would cause really negative effects in my clan and since I'm the highest level player there, we could even lose. The other option is to leave the clan, and that is just plain stupid.
.

[Spice]

100% gets you 100 xp. The experience is ridiculous. Nearly 200,000 to upgrade to level 40. That's nearly 2000 battles for one level, and ALL three stars. Barb king to level 40 takes one week. Could you gain 2000 three stars in one week?

[cnascime]

100% gets you 100 xp. The experience is ridiculous. Nearly 200,000 to upgrade to level 40. That's nearly 2000 battles for one level, and ALL three stars. Barb king to level 40 takes one week. Could you gain 2000 three stars in one week?

Dude did you even read my post?? First of all, you dont need to three star a base to get the points! If you do 70% you will get 70 points, for example. Second of all, 200,000 to upgrade to level 40?? Who even said that at all????

[Spice]

Dude did you even read my post?? First of all, you dont need to three star a base to get the points! If you do 70% you will get 70 points, for example. Second of all, 200,000 to upgrade to level 40?? Who even said that at all????

Ok, my bad, it's about 17000 to upgrade to level 40, not 200,000, I read the wrong column. Second, they don't have to be 3 stars to get the xp, I know, but out of 200,000, 100 xp would be the quickest. So for 17000, that would mean 170 3 stars. I'm not saying only 3 stars will get you xp, it's just the most. So, 170 3 stars in one week seems like a lot, versus waiting a week for it to upgrade.

[cnascime]

Ok, my bad, it's about 17000 to upgrade to level 40, not 200,000, I read the wrong column. Second, they don't have to be 3 stars to get the xp, I know, but out of 200,000, 100 xp would be the quickest. So for 17000, that would mean 170 3 stars. I'm not saying only 3 stars will get you xp, it's just the most. So, 170 3 stars in one week seems like a lot, versus waiting a week for it to upgrade.

I don't think three starring will be the quickest way. If you use barch, you can get 50% of a base in just 20 minutes. That means 150 points per hour + the bonus of the bb king or archer queen, which will be about 170 points per hour. But yeah, now that I think about it, it actually is quite a lot to get 17000 in just a week. If the average person does 12 attacks per day, he would gain 680 xp points. In a week that equals 4760 xp points, what do you think?

Remember that the point of this idea isn't to try to lower the upgrading time, but giving you the opportunity to still use your heroes during the upgrade.

[Jamminash]

My issue is players with lower levels acquire ring though gems to max hero's i have a simular suggestion simple. Limit the maximum hero to be based off you total xp level. Eg: level 100 could max hero at level 20. A 1/5 ratio from xp level to hero level

[CiscoKid]

Excellent, out of the box thinking OP. It's not often that you run across innovative and fresh ideas and solutions, and I voted "Yes" on this basis alone. That being said, I think it would be too much of an undertaking for SC to adopt. Heck, they haven't been able to fix the nexting / raiding issues, and that solution should be far easier to implement. I can't even fathom how long it would take them to put something like this into place...

[Jamminash]

Off subject whats nesting/raiding issue sorry new to forum chat? Ty

[Bebolopez]

There is many ways this is a bad idea here are a few lets be mature shall we?

ITS BAD ITS BAD ITS BAD TAKE IT AWAY MOMMY THIS THREAD SCARES ME PLEASE MOMMY ITS BAD!!!!!

[cnascime]

My issue is players with lower levels acquire ring though gems to max hero's i have a simular suggestion simple. Limit the maximum hero to be based off you total xp level. Eg: level 100 could max hero at level 20. A 1/5 ratio from xp level to hero level

That's a great idea man! It could be like this:

Level 0-80 = Hero capped at 10
80-100 = Hero capped at 20
100-120= Hero capped at 30
120 and above = Hero capped at 40