Clan War Ranking System Idea!

[BmooDyy]

The ranking system for the top clans doesn't mean anything, some of the clans in the top 10 have minimal wins and one even has 0 wins. The ranking system should not go by number of trophies, but by a different system which I will explain.

Every clan should start out with 1,000 points and gain or lose points with wins/ loses. The amount of points gained or lost should depend on the record and/ or amount of points the opposing clan has.

For example, if clan A has 1,200 points and a record of 8-2 and they beat Clan B who has 1,050 points and a record of 3-2, then clan A would only gain a small amount of points. But if clan B would win the war using the same scenario, then they would gain many points because they had fewer at the start of the war and their record was worse.

The amount of points gained or lost depending on previous amount of points and/ or record is up for discussion. Also, please give me feedback about this idea. Thanks!

EDIT: Changing the clan ranking system to this format will get make the game more interactive in a way. More players will strive to be at the top, which in turn could mean more new players to the game because they want friends to join their clan. There are many other positives to the players and to Supercell that I won't go into, I just hope that this idea will be considered for the game.

EDIT2: To the people who are confused about this, individual trophies would NOT be changed and players would still be placed into leagues how they are now. It's the clans that would be ranked by points instead of trophies.

[CapnKaye]

But good idea though.

[yankeesrock21298]

I like this idea

[BmooDyy]

But good idea though.

Oh, we'll even if it does go by level then that should be changed too. I would bet that most if not all of the top people have paid to upgrade at some point, so it's not fair to everyone else that they automatically get top clan.

[BmooDyy]

I like this idea

Thanks, any suggestions for the idea?

[Sokitani]

The ranking system for the top clans doesn't mean anything, some of the clans in the top 10 have minimal wins and one even has 0 wins. The ranking system should not go by number of trophies, but by a different system which I will explain.

Every clan should start out with 1,000 points and gain or lose points with wins/ loses. The amount of points gained or lost should depend on the record and/ or amount of points the opposing clan has.

For example, if clan A has 1,200 points and a record of 8-2 and they beat Clan B who has 1,050 points and a record of 3-2, then clan A would only gain a small amount of points. But if clan B would win the war using the same scenario, then they would gain many points because they had fewer at the start of the war and their record was worse.

The amount of points gained or lost depending on previous amount of points and/ or record is up for discussion. Also, please give me feedback about this idea. Thanks!

EDIT: Changing the clan ranking system to this format will get make the game more interactive in a way. More players will strive to be at the top, which in turn could mean more new players to the game because they want friends to join their clan. There are many other positives to the players and to Supercell that I won't go into, I just hope that this idea will be considered for the game.

I dont get your idea...

"gain or lose points with wins/ loses" your talkin bout clan wars i think

Why shouldnt clans be ranked by trophies??

[Ayyyyyema]

So clans get ranked by how many wars they win? Lol what about clans that dont do wars, does that automatically make us a "bad clan" and low rank. I'm not following what you're suggesting.

[komohammad]

I dont get your idea... "gain or lose points with wins/ loses" your talkin bout clan wars i think Why shouldnt clans be ranked by trophies??

Because clan wars shows how a clan is doing together, their strategies, how they work together and etc beside that trophies in clans with more members is higher than in clans with less members (clan members shouldn't be considered as a factor).

So clans get ranked by how many wars they win? Lol what about clans that dont do wars, does that automatically make us a "bad clan" and low rank. I'm not following what you're suggesting.

Yes, Clans that do not do wars should be considered as a bad clan because you can't work together well...

[BmooDyy]

I dont get your idea...

"gain or lose points with wins/ loses" your talkin bout clan wars i think

Why shouldnt clans be ranked by trophies??

So clans get ranked by how many wars they win? Lol what about clans that dont do wars, does that automatically make us a "bad clan" and low rank. I'm not following what you're suggesting.

Because clan wars shows how a clan is doing together, their strategies, how they work together and etc beside that trophies in clans with more members is higher than in clans with less members (clan members shouldn't be considered as a factor). Yes, Clans that do not do wars should be considered as a bad clan because you can't work together well...

What komohammad said is what I mean, along with the fact that most if not all top players have paid and no one else has a chance to be at the top unless they pay also. But what he said in response to Ayyyyyema, I don't believe that any clan that doesn't do wars is bad, they just don't do wars that's all. They will stay at the 1,000 clan point mark and never go up or down. Now their clan rank in the world will go up and down because of other clans doing wars, but that doesn't make them "bad."

[Bresn]

SC is unfair with the ranking's gem reward. Changing the ranking system is needed.


1) The clans used way more gem, they still have to pay money for more gems
2) Always the top five or so, the very existence of the ranking reward is a mockery.


And it make senses because for the sake of logic I don't shake my hands with you in a village truce to go in lala land and farm all day. Logic wise, we would be attacking other clans, not making peace and not atking other Clans.