Trolling needs conseuqnces!!!

[CRFclan]

Okay can this whole penalty thing be removed at lvl 70 or something then?

Yes, that is a wonderful addition!

I think after a certain level, the limits should no longer affect the player, due to dedication the player has shown.

[cobia74]

Oh, your just teasing me now at this point haha

If you ran for President, I'd vote for you!

It would be a good idea, only I would add a safe zone, for linked clans...

An example being:

If Player A is currently in Clan 1, but has family and friends in Clan 2, he could link his clans together so he could freely cross between clans, without being affected by a timer or another consequence that would be implemented. Someone brought that up earlier and it makes a lot of sense, especially with the people that have good intentions when they hop back and forth.

That way it punishes the bad players, while the good players play in solitude.

Linking clans could be in the second iteration, I think you may be presently surprised by leaving it in the clans hands.
If clan members have a problem with a players actions they will attack, if they are friends or family members they probably won't attack, and people may do it for fun within the clan.
e.g. I bet you can't 2 star me, so they leave then rejoin and the clan gets to see if they can get 2 stars off the player all in good fun.

[KingofClash9923]

Yes, that is a wonderful addition!

I think after a certain level, the limits should no longer affect the player, due to dedication the player has shown.

I think this is a nice addition then!

[CRFclan]

Linking clans could be in the second iteration, I think you may be presently surprised by leaving it in the clans hands.
If clan members have a problem with a players actions they will attack, if they are friends or family members they probably won't attack, and people may do it for fun within the clan.
e.g. I bet you can't 2 star me, so they leave then rejoin and the clan gets to see if they can get 2 stars off the player all in good fun.

That would be a nice tribunal idea.

But I think that would be closer to the dueling idea, rather than the implementing a consequence as a preventative measure.

I think we nailed it on the head with the other replies, we've narrowed it down to a possibility that it might just be certain level groups, I.E. the lower and middle level accounts with bad intentions. After a certain level, lets say level 70, an account can no longer be hit with those consequences.

Trying my best not to use age groups as an excuse, so using account levels instead. But if the testimonial of it rarely happening after a certain account level is any indication and it certainly looks that way, then it's just about what playing field your in. I think it's a fair trade off with the new suggestion about consequences for leaving a clan stranded in a war. It'll hopefully prevent them from doing it at a later level, because it seems to get a little more serious around then.

[CRFclan]

The problem with finding a solution to this problem is that there are many people who travel between clans for valid reasons. Many members of my clan have friends in other clans. They often ask if they can leave for a few hours to talk to their friends. This is possible even during war as a player can leave and return during war and still participate. Other clans have multiple clans and feeders. Players often move from clan to clan to manage them.
Your idea, like many ideas put forward in the forum on this issue, of course, deal with the issue of trolling, however, they also punish the clans who move between clans for valid reasons. Unless there's a way to distinguish between these two types of players, I don't think it's fair to punish people doing the right thing.

I think the linking of friendly clans, like one bank account to another, would be a solid fix to distinguish players from each other. Each clan's leaders can easily accept or deny a request for, lets call it a "safety zone". So that way, good players like yourself, going from clan back to clan, won't occur any consequences. Whereas the player with bad intentions would be hit with a timer if he joined a random clan and left during a war, burning the current clan in the war.

Would that be a better idea than my original idea?

[CRFclan]

What about if it were a punishment imposed by the leader (and/or coleader) of the leaving clan? Of course a leader wouldn't punish a player who was leaving for a valid reason. However, if a troll left during war then the leader could select a button on the players profile through the clan chat. By pressing the button, the leader could impose a punishment of say a 5 day cool down from war or maybe joining another clan. That player could however rejoin the clan they left (in the case that through miscommunication they had no intention of trolling) and participate in the war. The leader could then choose to lift the ban at the end of the war if they feel the player tried to contribute.
This punishment could also be imposed only during war, so it couldn't be a punishment for every person leaving your clan during non-war times.

That is another great idea, however I believe that there won't be some merciful leaders out there. Let's say you get one leader that's in a bad mood, someone returns and participates in the war, then ends up losing anyways. It might just push that leader into a worse mood and punish them anyways.

[littleme]

They should do this. Its a good idea.

[Alfredogf]

I think the best way its to block the possibility of leaving the clan during the attack day.

[CRFclan]

They should do this. Its a good idea.

Thanks for your support!

[CRFclan]

I think the best way its to block the possibility of leaving the clan during the attack day.

Never considered that, I will add that to my main talking point on the first post, thanks!!!

It's a very good idea!