"Reserve" feature in clan wars

[MegalocerosIce]

Just wanted to tell u this, Yesterday when i wanted to attack a base some other clan mate attacked my mirror opponent and spoiled my attack/chance. But sometimes even if "Reserve" is there it would be overruled by the dumb mates. Looks unnecessary.

[gamul1]

I would like to see a marker system in game that allowed players to "claim" bases. The claim should be soft though and not prevent others attacking it to prevent the unfortunate event of someone disappearing.

Also, a leader should maybe be able to change/delete these - for example if someone clearly is attacking way too high or low the leader should be able to say - no, you shouldnt do that.

And maybe the tags should expire after X hours of claim or withing X% of time remaining in war.

[TheCangaceiro]

But sometimes even if "Reserve" is there it would be overruled by the dumb mates. Looks unnecessary.

Sorry to hear that. Been in this same situation before and it is infuriating really. You say the reserve feature is unnecessary, but if the game had this feature, you'd have proof in your hands that this member needs a good lesson. And you'd have this proof from within the game, quickly accessible, no need to go to 3rd party tools or read 100 chat messages.

[TheCangaceiro]

I would like to see a marker system in game that allowed players to "claim" bases. The claim should be soft though and not prevent others attacking it to prevent the unfortunate event of someone disappearing.

Also, a leader should maybe be able to change/delete these - for example if someone clearly is attacking way too high or low the leader should be able to say - no, you shouldnt do that.

And maybe the tags should expire after X hours of claim or withing X% of time remaining in war.

A recap of how I - and think you too - see this reserve/claim feature:
- a button on war map
- sets a tag on the base
- doesn't prevent others from attacking
- (co) leaders can override
- expires
- is made available after attack happened, so leaders know later on who attacked reserved/claimed bases

[BeerGod666]

I wouldn't like the idea if it prevented other clan mates from attacking (like a strict/exclusive reservation system).

but a flag or marker to indicate which base you intend to attack would work great in my clan too. we often train a specialist army for a particular base, and sometimes it gets 3-starred before the person gets a chance to attack.

it would be great if your flag/marker had your rank # on it - so ppl would know whose marker it was.

[TheCangaceiro]

I wouldn't like the idea if it prevented other clan mates from attacking (like a strict/exclusive reservation system).

but a flag or marker to indicate which base you intend to attack would work great in my clan too. we often train a specialist army for a particular base, and sometimes it gets 3-starred before the person gets a chance to attack.

it would be great if your flag/marker had your rank # on it - so ppl would know whose marker it was.

That's what I have in mind too. I believe the word "reservation" has raised quite an alarm. What I really wish to see is just a marker or tag as you say, or a "claim" feature as gamul1 said minutes ago. No stopping people from doing things, this tag would be just a means of communicating a wish of yours (to attack base X), just like the "in/out" button is nothing but an "expression of wish" to participate in wars or not, but a leader ultimately decides who goes or stays out of a war.