Should PEKKA 4 available for TH9?

[Awness]

wait what ?

why would you use GoWiPe on a TH8 when a simple , farming MiniLoons get you at least 2 stars on them :/ , basically every strat for pushing for th9 can 3 star a th8


its not "too OP" it is "balanced"

I don't use gowipe, probably twice in my CoC career. I use all archers against TH8s and TH9s. It's been my strat ever since TH7.

You're right, every strat can decimate TH8 and below. Adding another lvl to a pekka would add more insult to injury.

It's NOT balanced.

[Awness]

In fact, when adding another level to a troop, it should start WHERE it was unlocked. So everything is well balanced...

[Daemon]

I don't use gowipe, probably twice in my CoC career. I use all archers against TH8s and TH9s. It's been my strat ever since TH7.

You're right, every strat can decimate TH8 and below. Adding another lvl to a pekka would add more insult to injury.

It's NOT balanced.

its like saying TH9 shouldnt have drags lv4 ...because they already 3* th7 and dont need more power

and since you havent used GoWiPe please refrain from quoting me because i dont believe you fully understand what im talking about...

im talking about the balance in PEKKA levels to the 3 TH levels , in a normal GoWiPe TH9 have similar army ('cept golems) which isnt right

stop being so dense and think about it

TH8 have one lv in wizards , TH9 none and TH10 does
TH8 have one lv in WB, TH9 none and TH10 does
TH8 have one lv in Drags, TH9 none and TH10 does
but for a TH8 to have one lv in PEKKA, TH9 none and TH10 gets two additional levels......something is wrong here

[Anarchos]

Many troops/buildings skip a TH or have 2+ upgrades in a single TH level. Why should pekkas matter? L4 upgrade is TH10. No need to change it now.

[crucible]

So disadvantage the players who have been with Supercell/SoftBank the longest? Great idea!!

how is it a disadvantage if TH10 still have the higher lvl pekka...

[ClashinZach]

Th 9 needs lvl 4 pekkas... Would make th 9 gowipe an actually pushing army (besides cook time) since lvl 3 cant handle all the dps from th 10 defense

[Awness]

its like saying TH9 shouldnt have drags lv4 ...because they already 3* th7 and dont need more power

and since you havent used GoWiPe please refrain from quoting me because i dont believe you fully understand what im talking about...

im talking about the balance in PEKKA levels to the 3 TH levels , in a normal GoWiPe TH9 have similar army ('cept golems) which isnt right

stop being so dense and think about it

TH8 have one lv in wizards , TH9 none and TH10 does
TH8 have one lv in WB, TH9 none and TH10 does
TH8 have one lv in Drags, TH9 none and TH10 does
but for a TH8 to have one lv in PEKKA, TH9 none and TH10 gets two additional levels......something is wrong here

Dude, I was referring to the OP, not YOU or MASHER1.

Adding a lvl to pekka for TH9 would be already too OP against TH8 below. Sure we need more fire power to go against TH10s with their frikkin discos and added lvl to their teslas, it would be futile with Gowipe....probably we need to use GOWINT to go against them!!

[o0oAnnyo0o]

Many troops/buildings skip a TH or have 2+ upgrades in a single TH level. Why should pekkas matter? L4 upgrade is TH10. No need to change it now.

Well, I agree that sometime troops/building skip a TH OR have 2+ upgrades in a single TH lv.

Here, PEKKA skip a TH lv AND have 2+ upgrades in next TH lv. And I'm pretty sure it make a difference

Plus, for troops, the only time they have 2+ upgrade at the same lv is when you first unlock the troops, which is understandable

[Awness]

iand since you havent used GoWiPe please refrain from quoting me because i dont believe you fully understand what im talking about...

And another thing, don't quote me unless YOU have been quoted upon...because I don't believe you fully understand to whom I'm talking to...

[P4R4NO1D]

Why would anyone disagree with this?