I can easily give you an example of why this idea is bad. I'm ranked number one on leader board. I join my buddies clan, leave, he revenges me and loses on purpose. I repeat this with many others hundreds of times. Congratulations, you just made trophies obsolete.
Just saying that violinfun might just hop in order to donate more to level up or for the friend in need achievement.Originally Posted by EpicChris
Goodbye forums!
Hoppers go around requesting troops giving out free xp, they are great.
Very few hoppers come to donate, mostly we get the request, we fill it, they exit stage left...
True however you can do that anyways you lose more trophies by attacking a lower lvl and purposely losing I do it all the time! However you could use it to get donations that supercell has been refusing! By having them open up to there storages they leave the clan, sign out and you take revenge!!! So revenge is a bad idea!
So maybe they have to wait 2 hours and lose their cc troops if they are kicked, So there's reason for them to not be rude while in your clan! And they would not want to be kicked!
And if they leave of their own accord without asking for troops there is no penalty!
If they leave after asking for troops then they pay double the troop cost and no one collects the elixer! It would just be a penalty the computer takes kind of like when you hit the raid button!
And the option would be in clan edit with a box you can check! For those who don't mind hoppers! And it would be placed in the description of your clan, Hoppers Welcome!!!! Or No Hoppers!!!
It's funny... all the people coming in here who dislike the proposal haven't said a single thing about Street's idea regarding players losing donated troops. I even stated that his idea might be easier/better.
It's simple: if someone leaves a clan, for whatever reason, then they lose any donated troops that are in their clan castle. The people who donated keep the XP and maybe get back the elixir that was used to train the donated troops.
In that scenario there's no need of worrying about all the so-called "bullying" some posters seem to be so concerned about (ridiculously wrong to call this bullying and not say the same about revenge attacks, but whatever), hopping becomes nearly pointless to hoppers, and Supercell developers maybe don't have to work as hard to implement the idea.
Win/win... unless you're a hopper. And if you're a hopper I didn't make this thread for you... so buzz off. :-p
Last edited by AnonyJoe; August 16th, 2014 at 06:46 PM.
That would completely ruin the purpose of req & leave clans...
Would you care to explain how?
If leaving the clan would result in losing all your clan castle troops, people could not get troops from the req & leave clans, the purpose of which is to give troops to people, who would then leave.
Again, this is open to so many loopholes, like any other anti-hopper suggestion ever made.
What if the clan was inactive, bad in war, donated wrong troops (Gobs and wb), adult joining immature kids clan. So many reasons why the "hopper" is really innocent and should be allowed to leave without penalty.
Also, someone could coordinate attacks for loot or trophies. ie. having a primary attack a secondary account or arrange specific free raids for cheap shielding in champions league.
Sorry, this idea wouldnt work
Posting Permissions
