Base setup testing or practice option within your own clan

[Grepthar]

I suggest a feature added to where within your clan you can have a base
design tested using your clan mates. For example if I have an idea for a
good defense setup and I want to test it I could ask one of my clan mates to
attack my base. This would be just a practice mode type of thing and would
be something that you could opt in for maybe like a practice arena add-on.
There would be no trophy loss, just the elixir that was spent on the
troops. I could have a clan mate attack me using a certain amount of
troops or anything we agreed upon or just say give me your best shot. The
attacks would be able to be posted and other members could critique the
attack and defense and also provide helpful feedback. This would also help
people sharpen thier attack skills and learn how to attack more challenging opponents.

[iceageg]

Only because it was on the first page and easy to link to . . . here is the other request for the same thing just below yours. It contains a link to a much larger more informative thread. In essence, nobody wants it once it is nerfed enough to prevent exploiting.

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-within-a-clan

[Alfesicob]

Welcome to the forums!This idea had been posted numerous times please use the search function(top right) before posting.

[Grepthar]

Only because it was on the first page and easy to link to . . . here is the other request for the same thing just below yours. It contains a link to a much larger more informative thread. In essence, nobody wants it once it is nerfed enough to prevent exploiting.

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-within-a-clan

Yea I had the idea way before that guy. I just had trouble posting it this morning so I guess he got his in there before me. Mine had better detail like yours though. I went to the link back to yours and I saw where people just ripped it apart no matter how you suggested to fix the issue. Sorry about that. I really do think it is a great idea, but I guess getting past the exploitation part is the true problem. Thanks for letting me know so I didn't waste anymore thought on the idea.