Which will make Supercell more money?
100 gems ($1) to give someone 500k in Gold?
or
1750 gems ($14) to give someone 500k in Gold?
I find it odd how people somehow think an idea that would save people money somehow means that Supercell will make more money.
Supersell doesn't make money from the occasional 100 gem spender, they make it from those that have spent thousands on this game....
The trick is to give us juuuuuuuust enough gems that we know how helpful they are but not enough to really speed things along. Make us want to buy them. I'm sure SC has business analysts staring at metrics and studies on a pretty regular basis trying to ensure they feed enough into the market to keep it healthy. They probably love reading all of the "I need more gems" themed posts.
Last edited by iceageg; August 5th, 2014 at 07:40 PM.
Bingo. With as much money as they make, I'm sure they have a financial analyst that's laughing at these type of requests.
The term "RULED OUT" as defined by a variety of dictionaries is "To reject from list of possibilities" and "To make something impossible" or "To disallow"
So yes, being considered RULED OUT may not mean the CAN'T do it, it means they WON'T do it. Not at this time, not without further review.
The option to buy resources makes this pointless. They want people who want to get resources by not raiding or collectors to spend as much as possible. Presenting a way to allow people to receive resources way cheaper is not in their best interest. Not to mention comparing 100 gems or however much for 10k DE is way cheaper for a TH7 that wants to gem their king
Donating resources and variations on that basic idea are currently ruled out.
|Trophy Offer Formulas Discovered!|
^Now with a handy table linking offers and cup differences^
RIP Smash Land