Replacement for clan wars during perpetration day.

[Sirflirtsallot]

Ok, so I'll elaborate, but what i mean is that we should be able to replace people in the war if someone leaves while they are in our war. Like clan hoppers that join a war then leave. Those people do nothing to participate in the war so I think their should be an option to first remove them from the war then replace them with someone rather similar in strength or weaker. I don't say stronger because that could potentially ruin the war since I could start a war then replace all my weak members with stronger members from a family clan to win a war. So the kick and replace button should only be allowed. With members of a relatively similar strength or weaker. Weaker is fine, because I'm sure the, Enemy wouldn't worry much if a clans top player got replaced by a player in like the 20's in level or so. I'll try rephrasing this because I think it sounds confusing right now.

1. Players who join a war, then leave right after should be kicked from the war.
2. Players who are kicked from the war should be replaced by someone who is similar in strength or weaker.( for weaker, they can be any level below that of the previous war member.)
3. A member who is replaced in a war cannot be stronger then the previous member, so that a clan cant abuse their power, by clan hoping into a weak clan and dominating the war.

P.s. Thanks for reading my thread, and be sure to comment on it below.

[Sirflirtsallot]

Ok, so I'll elaborate, but what i mean is that we should be able to replace people in the war if someone leaves while they are in our war. Like clan hoppers that join a war then leave. Those people do nothing to participate in the war so I think their should be an option to first remove them from the war then replace them with someone rather similar in strength or weaker. I don't say stronger because that could potentially ruin the war since I could start a war then replace all my weak members with stronger members from a family clan to win a war. So the kick and replace button should only be allowed. With members of a relatively similar strength or weaker. Weaker is fine, because I'm sure the, Enemy wouldn't worry much if a clans top player got replaced by a player in like the 20's in level or so. I'll try rephrasing this because I think it sounds confusing right now.

1. Players who join a war, then leave right after should be kicked from the war.
2. Players who are kicked from the war should be replaced by someone who is similar in strength or weaker.( for weaker, they can be any level below that of the previous war member.)
3. A member who is replaced in a war cannot be stronger then the previous member, so that a clan cant abuse their power, by clan hoping into a weak clan and dominating the war.

P.s. Thanks for reading my thread, and be sure to comment on it below.

oh, another p.s., but if you see a problem in my thread can you please try to think of a solution instead of just blatantly shooting my idea down, thanks, now continue with your 2 cents on the subject.

[ClashySquill]

The only problem I could see is somebody fr the enemy join, who wasn't in the war, then somebody from your clan leaves and they fill in and sabatoge, so maybe you have to be in the clan when the war starts to be able to come in as a replacement and also maybe make it so you can only sub in the first 12 hours maybe to prevent people from just switching 4 people out right when the war begins, but other then that good idea

[Sirflirtsallot]

The only problem I could see is somebody fr the enemy join, who wasn't in the war, then somebody from your clan leaves and they fill in and sabatoge, so maybe you have to be in the clan when the war starts to be able to come in as a replacement and also maybe make it so you can only sub in the first 12 hours maybe to prevent people from just switching 4 people out right when the war begins, but other then that good idea

That, could be prevented if the leaders where the ones who decided to who the replacement would be. Also the leader could be the player who wants to be the replacement came from the enemy clan.
Ahhh... Sorry, I meant the leader could be notified that the player who wants to be the replacement came from the enemy clan. But I think that would make the game more realistic too. You could have spies amongst your army. Might be fun for a little wile but could get annoying fast.

[Phyxios]

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...itelist-option

[Sirflirtsallot]

http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...itelist-option

Sorry, but this tread is different from mine, and I personally i dont like the idea of people signing up to join. It's far to time consuming so the idea that the leaders have control is much more plausible.

[Sirflirtsallot]

............

[Mater57]

Its all well in good but let's also add if you can't replace them after the war the leader can fight them for there share of the loot

[Sirflirtsallot]

Its all well in good but let's also add if you can't replace them after the war the leader can fight them for there share of the loot

Sorry, but I don't think that would work. I think it would give one player too much power during a clan war.

[Sirflirtsallot]

..................