View Poll Results: Want to see Matchmaking improved and/or want to fix matchmaking

Voters
246. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    213 86.59%
  • No

    33 13.41%
Page 60 of 82 FirstFirst ... 1050585960616270 ... LastLast
Results 591 to 600 of 811

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: War matching I think needs work

  1. #591
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    24
    the past 10 wars or so we've been in our clan was always the underdog, not a lot of equality... this last one was the first equal-ish one we've had

    id like to know how the clans are matched

  2. #592
    Forum Superstar TheJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Retired from Clash.
    Posts
    3,133
    Yep happened to me. But even worse. 18 TH10 VS 31. The rest was maxed TH9s compared to 22 average TH9 players and 5 TH8. They have a lv110+ minimum for joining, we have an 80+. If you don't believe me, check out the clans Qarth Thieves and Nuff Said...

    Retired Clash of Clans Base Designer | TH9 Base Design Compilation







  3. #593
    Junior Member warheadplaya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    53
    I think at least a few of us posting here are in agreement the wars need to be matched more fairly. Hopefully something is done about this.

  4. #594
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by warheadplaya View Post
    I think at least a few of us posting here are in agreement the wars need to be matched more fairly. Hopefully something is done about this.
    Also try doing 45 vs 45....i would think that 50 vs 50 is tougher for sc to pair evenly...so the parameters may be wider to get an opponent.

  5. #595
    Junior Member soapman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    83
    we have warmatching that goes both ways
    sometimes in our favour and sometimes in the enemys favour

    still had a red hot go at the clan that was clearly better than us in terms of troops defences and heroes tho

  6. #596
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    862
    This has been an ongoing issue with several people. Some clans are good enough to get by regardless. My clan is not one of them although we do alright and beat Temple City (64 wins I think).

    We've had some bigtime blowouts where they were completely outmatched and some where we were completely outmatched because we are a decent war clan but not hardcore.

    At least it will be easy to hit the war button immediately after it is over assuming you don't go boycott or something.

  7. #597
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,111
    Quote Originally Posted by jsc View Post
    Also try doing 45 vs 45....i would think that 50 vs 50 is tougher for sc to pair evenly...so the parameters may be wider to get an opponent.
    no.. don't try 45v45

    just search one and we got WAR IMPERIUM.. number 10 clan in the world.

    35/45 bases with max heroes vs our 2 bases with max heroes
    20 bases with max walls vs our NO bases with max walls

    their number 45 base has 35/35 heroes! and max infernos and our 45 base is TH9 with 8/13 heroes

    tell me where the matchmaking is working here Supercell.. this is the second war in a row that you gave us a ♥♥ match.. the last one was U.S.A a Top 25 clan
    FIX CLAN WARS!

  8. #598
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    862
    Quote Originally Posted by rdtx2012 View Post
    no.. don't try 45v45

    just search one and we got WAR IMPERIUM.. number 10 clan in the world.

    35/45 bases with max heroes vs our 2 bases with max heroes
    20 bases with max walls vs our NO bases with max walls

    their number 45 base has 35/35 heroes! and max infernos and our 45 base is TH9 with 8/13 heroes

    tell me where the matchmaking is working here Supercell.. this is the second war in a row that you gave us a ♥♥ match.. the last one was U.S.A a Top 25 clan
    Ugh that sounds like fun LOL. Our search actually took quite awhile so was hopeful we would pair up evenly but have our 7 TH 10 one with max golems vs their 13 TH 10 and several max golem guys, etc. We went from a 13 win streak including beating a 64 win clan to looking at losing 3 out of last 4 (sigh). Granted, we've been on receiving side too so clearly there are still some bad mismatches both ways.

  9. #599
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,111
    Quote Originally Posted by littlefish View Post
    Ugh that sounds like fun LOL. Our search actually took quite awhile so was hopeful we would pair up evenly but have our 7 TH 10 one with max golems vs their 13 TH 10 and several max golem guys, etc. We went from a 13 win streak including beating a 64 win clan to looking at losing 3 out of last 4 (sigh). Granted, we've been on receiving side too so clearly there are still some bad mismatches both ways.

    I hear ya.. We gave it a go last time against USA but lose 94-48 or something like that. But now this one, i don't know.. there isn't any incentive to attack a top 10 clan when you know you will be trounced into the ground when the match is skewed like this.

    who would want to waste 3500-5000 DE on a Gowi-variant when they can just easily gem everything attack with their 40 heroes with ease?

    maybe if there is a loot multiplier because of the skew, perhaps there is more incentive to actually attack
    FIX CLAN WARS!

  10. #600
    Pro Member powerbottom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    539
    We just got matched into a 30vs30 ( when we have 36). They have six TH10s six TH9s twelve TH8s six TH7s. All of them but couple are very well upgraded bases. We have a rushed TH10,9. Thirteen TH8s, fifteen TH7s. Its a fart in the matchmaking system. There is no way any sort of math makes us fairly matched. This is the first time I've seen this error in the system.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •