War matching I think needs work

[Aspekt]

Although I don't agree with is petition, I do have a suggestion.

I think what you are looking for is tighter algorithm for closer matchup. Therefore, instead of having the ability to adjust the maximum wait time, it should be how tight or lose the matchup should be.

Setting up the maximum wait time at 1-10 hours won't stop the algorithm from giving you a easier/harder matchup. Unless of course, you are saying longer wait time equals to closer matchup, then it would work.

[gringoboy70]

Doesn't that tell you something then? If so many people are bothering to write on the forum on this subject with such regularity..... Perhaps they have a point???... or is everyone wrong?

In an ironic way you have managed to support my original point.

It tells me how many players completely suck at the game. It tells me you guys would rather whine then learn to play. If you can raid well, you will win almost all your wars. How about you post replays from some of your top players if you think that you are losing because of townhall differences and not because you guys are complete ♥♥♥♥♥♥s.

[Benny1001]

It tells me how many players completely suck at the game. It tells me you guys would rather whine then learn to play. If you can raid well, you will win almost all your wars. How about you post replays from some of your top players if you think that you are losing because of townhall differences and not because you guys are complete ♥♥♥♥♥♥s.

Such a well compiled, educated response will get what your low intellect deserves: No response.

[gringoboy70]

Such a well compiled, educated response will get what your low intellect deserves: No response.

That's what I thought. Well you keep asking supercell to correct a system that they already are continuously working on, but works nonetheless, and continue losing wars that any competent clan could cake walk through.

[Benny1001]

That's what I thought. Well you keep asking supercell to correct a system that they already are continuously working on, but works nonetheless, and continue losing wars that any competent clan could cake walk through.

Its such a shame that every time a player posts a genuine frustration with the blatantly unfair match-ups; someone feels the need to pointlessly annotate, and distract from the genuine issue: The current match-making is consistently unfair. Something needs to be changed urgently.

All people want is to know that their feedback is being listened to by the people that matter... SC. An acknowledgment that there is light at the end of the tunnel.

In any other industry if so many 'customers' were complaining about an issue, the company would address it. That's all that i want (and I'm not alone, clearly)

[Sirix]

Until someone posts a pic of every base vs every other opponents base to support their whining, ♥♥♥♥.

It would help if you post pics of bases for these mismatch wars

Its such a shame that every time a player posts a genuine frustration with the blatantly unfair match-ups; someone feels the need to pointlessly annotate, and distract from the genuine issue: The current match-making is consistently unfair. Something needs to be changed urgently.

If what you're saying is true, provide evidence

[gringoboy70]

Its such a shame that every time a player posts a genuine frustration with the blatantly unfair match-ups; someone feels the need to pointlessly annotate, and distract from the genuine issue: The current match-making is consistently unfair. Something needs to be changed urgently.

All people want is to know that their feedback is being listened to by the people that matter... SC. An acknowledgment that there is light at the end of the tunnel.

In any other industry if so many 'customers' were complaining about an issue, the company would address it. That's all that i want (and I'm not alone, clearly)

They already have addressed it, do you use the forums to read or just cry? You have not posted anything to show how "unfair" the match up is besides the levels of your openents which have absolutely no relation to clan wars or base strength. Funny how people don't post much when they are winning, but when they lose, it becomes supercell's fault.

[Benny1001]

They already have addressed it, do you use the forums to read or just cry? You have not posted anything to show how "unfair" the match up is besides the levels of your openents which have absolutely no relation to clan wars or base strength. Funny how people don't post much when they are winning, but when they lose, it becomes supercell's fault.

If not SuperCell's fault.... Who else's can it be for a blatant unfair matchup regularly?

As far as proving by pictures.... Its almost impossible. I can take screen shots of bases if you like.... But i haven't a clue how to attach them to the forum....?

[Silvex]

benny how about this...

make a chart as follows:

our th lvls	it lvls	xbow lvls		their th lvls	it lvls	xbow lvls
10	2 L2s	3 L3s		10	2 L3s	3 L3s
9	0	2 L2s		10	L1 & L2	3 L3s

etc

if you want to add hero lvls as well, just add the columns.

[Silvex]

Hi guys, maybe someone who can read the games ifile can look into how it is actually matched. You may be surprised to find it is based on cup levels. Nothing more nothing less. But I have a feeling that many clans already know this, and are manipulating their cups to help aid war victories.

And before you ask, no my idevices are not jailbroken!

... are you for real?