Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 69

Thread: Valks new 3 star CW army?

  1. #51
    Centennial Club Milanese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Polaris View Post
    I've been playing around with a valk/hog mixed army the last couple of days.....seems promising so far. valks act as a core killer while the hogs run rampant on the other defenses. Oddly enough I lose very few hogs with this composition, as the xbows and infernos tend to target the valks.
    That's an interesting combo. I like the idea. Could you share a replay? Valks are great core killers though, I agree.

    IGN:Milanese - OneHive

  2. #52
    Forum All-Star NioTheDreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    4,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Czar View Post
    yes but what will you rage ? the valks have run off and are alone..I have though recovered and thrown rage if AQ is around.. or if the wiz catch up..but there are casualties just cause of that drag... plus one spell goes down the drain...


    I usually attack the top 3 in CW which are almost maxxed th10s, on weaker bases valks are great..but so are many other troops

    and an army costing 5000 de for these run away brides is not worth the risk..
    1) Not saying Valks are stronger than GoWi
    2) Not saying there more efficient than Loons

    More comparable to drags

    The rage is all about placement. If you pick your attack location well you should have wizards following close behind. I attacked a base with a drag, both centralized heros, and level 2 infernos. Heros where lvl 15ish. 1 rage and a completely poorly placed freeze and the core was gutted. Wizards easily dispatched the drag who struggle to keep pace with the Valks

    Chief Pat has some 2 star videos on maxed bases with Valks.

    I am ONLY saying they are viable. It's also cheaper than a GoWiWi style attack.

    Is it stronger than GoWiPe? No.


    They are intersting to use and certainly not the new hogs. I did more than my fair share of botched Valk combos, but like any strategy it is strong vs certain bases and weak on others. I also agree tha it's allot more appealing as a th9, when you can still throw in a heal spell without fear of infernos

    But it is viable and it's something "new"

  3. #53
    Centennial Club Milanese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by NioTheDreamer View Post
    1) Not saying Valks are stronger than GoWi
    2) Not saying there more efficient than Loons

    More comparable to drags

    The rage is all about placement. If you pick your attack location well you should have wizards following close behind. I attacked a base with a drag, both centralized heros, and level 2 infernos. Heros where lvl 15ish. 1 rage and a completely poorly placed freeze and the core was gutted. Wizards easily dispatched the drag who struggle to keep pace with the Valks

    Chief Pat has some 2 star videos on maxed bases with Valks.

    I am ONLY saying they are viable. It's also cheaper than a GoWiWi style attack.

    Is it stronger than GoWiPe? No.


    They are intersting to use and certainly not the new hogs. I did more than my fair share of botched Valk combos, but like any strategy it is strong vs certain bases and weak on others. I also agree tha it's allot more appealing as a th9, when you can still throw in a heal spell without fear of infernos

    But it is viable and it's something "new"
    Very well said nio.

    IGN:Milanese - OneHive

  4. #54
    Trainee ElWombat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    12
    Great video! Don't see myself getting my valks up anytime soon, but it's definitely worth thinking about in the future when Gowiwi and Gowipe get boring.

  5. #55
    Senior Member GCB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    227
    I was actually talking about this as a new approach the other night. stats wise it all makes sense. The main problem for me is the train time. 3 hrs for 24 valks, which is just ridiculous. Simply non viable as a regular army. Overnighter at best. But I enjoyed the vid, demonstrated the potential well.

  6. #56
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    62
    wow looks good, definitely have to try that sometime

  7. #57
    Centennial Club Milanese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by ElWombat View Post
    Great video! Don't see myself getting my valks up anytime soon, but it's definitely worth thinking about in the future when Gowiwi and Gowipe get boring.
    Yo wombat! Yeah it's a fun composition to play around with for sure. I prefer gowipe in most cases

    IGN:Milanese - OneHive

  8. #58
    Centennial Club Milanese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by FirelordJono View Post
    wow looks good, definitely have to try that sometime
    Give her a whirl!

    Quote Originally Posted by GCB View Post
    I was actually talking about this as a new approach the other night. stats wise it all makes sense. The main problem for me is the train time. 3 hrs for 24 valks, which is just ridiculous. Simply non viable as a regular army. Overnighter at best. But I enjoyed the vid, demonstrated the potential well.
    Yeah most definitely not a regular army lol, overnight is viable for cw attacks though. Try it out I think you'll enjoy it! And thanks a ton!��
    Last edited by Milanese; July 9th, 2014 at 02:51 AM.

    IGN:Milanese - OneHive

  9. #59
    Trainee winkeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10
    Great raid, glad i'm on your side

    IGN: Winkeh
    Clan: OneHive

  10. #60
    Centennial Club Milanese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by winkeh View Post
    Great raid, glad i'm on your side
    Thanks wink! Sig lookin good homie.

    IGN:Milanese - OneHive

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •