View Poll Results: Like this?

Voters
5. You may not vote on this poll
  • Like

    3 60.00%
  • Dislike

    2 40.00%
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Global War Leader Board [☆☆☆]

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Mars, Russia
    Posts
    750

    Arrow Global War Leader Board [☆☆☆]

    Add global war leader-board based on some index.

    Now if you start a new clan you can never reach the amount of "war wins" as some older clans. Therefore your clan will always look noobish, even though you play wars very well. So I suggest to use some global clans ranking in wars based on some index, which can depend on following factors: "amount of wars won in a row", "stars won / total possible stars", "average stars per attack", "time passed since last war" (so that if clan becomes inactive it starts to lose their score). May be top 3 clans in such ranking should also receive gem bonuses, but it is not that important.

  2. #2
    Forum Elder mcleo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,093
    Quote Originally Posted by MrLeeGrahamNord View Post
    Add global war leader-board based on some index.

    Now if you start a new clan you can never reach the amount of "war wins" as some older clans. Therefore your clan will always look noobish, even though you play wars very well. So I suggest to use some global clans ranking in wars based on some index, which can depend on following factors: "amount of wars won in a row", "stars won / total possible stars", "average stars per attack", "time passed since last war" (so that if clan becomes inactive it starts to lose their score). May be top 3 clans in such ranking should also receive gem bonuses, but it is not that important.
    I like that suggestion a lot, the current ranking system does not allow clans that started later to ever reach the top, no matter how well they play. Looking at my own clan, we did 7 wars but always with teriffic scores, last battle won with 50 - 15, battle before with 48 - 3, these figures should not go unnoticed as they are today. It would make perfect sense if the algorithm to define clan positions on the leader board gets changed to this.

    You have my vote sir! :-)
    Just quoted from SC website: Many of us had been big fans of games like World of Warcraft, which most people play for years, not just weeks or months. Our dream was to create game services with longevity like that. And we wanted to create them for the widest group of people possible. They would be games that almost everyone could get into.
    We believed (author´s note: past sentense) in the power of simple, fun game play.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Mars, Russia
    Posts
    750
    More feedback please?

  4. #4
    Pro Member Fusi0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Sorry You Can't Log onto COC, Give Me Three Minutes or So
    Posts
    501
    Quote Originally Posted by mcleo View Post
    I like that suggestion a lot, the current ranking system does not allow clans that started later to ever reach the top, no matter how well they play. Looking at my own clan, we did 7 wars but always with teriffic scores, last battle won with 50 - 15, battle before with 48 - 3, these figures should not go unnoticed as they are today. It would make perfect sense if the algorithm to define clan positions on the leader board gets changed to this.

    You have my vote sir! :-)
    Wel, then obviously the other clan wasn't trying. And if it was based on something like that, leaders of both clans could work out some sort of deal to get an awesome say, 150 - 0 star win.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •