No more losing in defense. Click here!!!

[BlatantTruth]

Naming & shaming is not allowed on the forums. Talking about exploits is not allowed on the forums. It's really quite sad that whenever MEGA is mentioned people automatically think of them as ♥♥♥♥♥ers. Chief Pat talks a fine game, but doesn't back it up with evidence. Similar to what you're doing.

You have no idea what you are talking about because obviously you are not in champ league. it's an issue that has to be dealt with, hence why it was brought up. you want evidence. look at people in top 200 clans, especially top 50. Tell me why their donations are so low. is it because they leave to visit all the time? No because they leave clan to be found by others who know them and will not take as many cups when found. I think not showing player name, clan shield and clan name when attacking someone will stop this nonsense. After you attack someone the result will show who you attacked. I think this is the best option to stabilize those in champ league.

[Growler]

See the forum 'experts' first reaction was to jump down someone's throat and make themselves look stupid

Will they ever learn...

[Anarchos]

Wow, 3 days later the thread finally gets moved.

[Fros]

Then you explain what is happening, you MEGA expert.

I think 6 defense wins in 6 days is enough evidence. When she had 3 or 4 it could pass off as lucky, but with no clan castle troops with a common design and 6 defensive wins, something fishy is going on.

You have no idea what you are talking about because obviously you are not in champ league. it's an issue that has to be dealt with, hence why it was brought up. you want evidence. look at people in top 200 clans, especially top 50. Tell me why their donations are so low. is it because they leave to visit all the time? No because they leave clan to be found by others who know them and will not take as many cups when found. I think not showing player name, clan shield and clan name when attacking someone will stop this nonsense. After you attack someone the result will show who you attacked. I think this is the best option to stabilize those in champ league.

We don't even know if this "issue," aka cheap shielding is true. Yes, cheap shielding was a HUGE problem, but SC patched it. The odds of your own clan members/allies finding you is minuscule. OP has pics, yet he doesn't reveal them. I've seen 0 evidence. Sure, you can say PR has 6 defensive wins, and yes, that is quite unusual. However, that doesn't mean she's using this method. Without actual proof this is just libel which, as it happens, is illegal in the U.S..

[HFlashman]

I think 6 defense wins in 6 days is enough evidence. When she had 3 or 4 it could pass off as lucky, but with no clan castle troops with a common design and 6 defensive wins, something fishy is going on.

So...looking at my profile it states I have 7 defense "wins" ... I don't know how "common" my base design is...I developed it myself. I also am an "Indie" never being in any clan.

Given that, and no other "proof", would you state " something fishy" with my situation?

[lihou696]

We don't even know if this "issue," aka cheap shielding is true. Yes, cheap shielding was a HUGE problem, but SC patched it. The odds of your own clan members/allies finding you is minuscule. OP has pics, yet he doesn't reveal them. I've seen 0 evidence. Sure, you can say PR has 6 defensive wins, and yes, that is quite unusual. However, that doesn't mean she's using this method. Without actual proof this is just libel which, as it happens, is illegal in the U.S..

May happen that it's illegal in the US, however, I'm not from the US, SC is not based in the US, I'm able to make all the accusations I like However I choose not to because the current evidence again PR in particular is not quite there enough to go and make accusations, as others have said, wait till next Sunday see where it all lies then. GO from then for now I would say we all just leave this thread and come back to it

[Fros]

May happen that it's illegal in the US, however, I'm not from the US, SC is not based in the US, I'm able to make all the accusations I like However I choose not to because the current evidence again PR in particular is not quite there enough to go and make accusations, as others have said, wait till next Sunday see where it all lies then. GO from then for now I would say we all just leave this thread and come back to it

Defamation is illegal in Azerbaijan, People's Republic of China, India, Republic of Korea, Former Soviet Union, Nepal, Philippines, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Canada, United States, Mexico, and finally Australia all deem defamation (slander and/or libel) illegal. So, IF you choose to make your accusation, then I hope you don't live in any of those countries.

[aitgvet]

Defamation is illegal in Azerbaijan, People's Republic of China, India, Republic of Korea, Former Soviet Union, Nepal, Philippines, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Canada, United States, Mexico, and finally Australia all deem defamation (slander and/or libel) illegal. So, IF you choose to make your accusation, then I hope you don't live in any of those countries.

Sorry, what does libel mean? Accusing someone of doing something? If that's illegal, that's pretty hilariously stupid. Hopefully no one really cares if they get accused of ch3atinging in a game, though, right?

[DCMaxxx]

Some people know what's going on, and they're stating that. If anyone (champ league) thinks that this is not true, the next time there's a maintenance break... try and be online right when coc comes back online and go to your revenge list. You'll get at least one revenge in, and potentially more if you attack quickly.

The reason you can revenge after maint breaks in champ league is bc the player is not going from "online" to the defensive queue. They're going from "on shield" to the def queue, therefore isn't affected by the mandatory pass like normally. This is the same for this concept. By not logging in and allowing your shield to expire with you offline, you go from "on shield" to def, just the same as after a maint break. If you aren't able to test the maint break thing, just ask some top players if they've every revenged after a maint break. It won't take long to find one or many. I have gotten at least one revenge attack in after any time I've been able to try immediately after coc comes back online.

This isn't an assumption that the OP is making. It's something that is true whether or not anyone wants to believe it.... and not in a "lego machine using, $10,000 a day spending, game ♥♥♥♥ing" kind of way. More like a "the earth is round" kind of way.

I agree with the OP that this is Pandora's box. The game will (and has) fundamentally changed at the top. Players are being innovative and competitive, as we are supposed to. But this new wrinkle in the game should inspire supercell to grow and innovate it's rules just as the game players grow and innovate.

Just expand the revenge restriction in champions league to include players transitioning from "shield" to defense. - Problem solved. Just like they put in a personal break and numerous other things, it's time for the next adjustment.

That's my .02 and I applaud the OP for coming and deciding to inform people and possibly improve the game for all of us. It's no secret that this community can be abrasive and inhospitable towards trophy pushers. So the fact that they still came and wanted to put this out there should speak volumes.

Sorry for the redonkulously long response.

Nice explanation. Hope SC will fix this, now.

[Phoenix64]

If this is true they should get no more defense wins. You cant win up there without a CC unless the attacker has been drinking heavily.

I am quoting this later.