Unfair 深圳 clan on CW got captured from their own QQ conversation

[SargeantZeal]

No name and shame policy in a public forum within cyberspace have their own reasoning. Virtual proof is easily fabricated and virtually impossible to confirm. Pics can be edited, text altered and such. People would go to such lenghts to frame others in an enviroment where anonymosity is paramount and only virtual stakes are on the line.

Investigating such accusations would require near superhuman effort and even if in the end the accused is proven innocent, their virtual name and reputation will be tarnished because the word of their innocence wont go as far and wide as the accusation that fell upon them. Its only natural that people are more interested in news of people being bad or corrupted than they are being good and decent. After all, in the virtual world, the people themselves spread the news around, and if their interest is not sufficient, they would just stop spreading the word.

Just saying what I'm thinking on the issue of why public online medias having no name and shame policies...

[AxionXD]

That's stupid. Name and shame is a proven method of corrective action. If you don't want bad publicity don't cheet. Tons of retail shops will post bounced checks on a wall of shame, and those have full name and addresses. People here are posting virtual names of people who clearly violate rules. Yet you're going to reprimand them instead. Get a grip chief.

A bounced check is solid evidence of an infraction and the ones posting it on the wall of shame are employees or owners of the establishment. Its their store, their policy.

Name and shame is a policy - some adapt it, some don't. You do not have the right to violate said policy to try to enforce other written policies.t

To use your analogy appropriately to relate to what name and shaming that goes on in the forums is like me reporting a crime, thinking the cops aren't gonna do anything about it before they have a chance to, so you walk into the police station and post wanted pictures onto their bulletin boards and blotters. You have no authority to do so, much like here on the forums, they do not give you the authority to act on the behalf of supercell as the judge, jury and executioner of what they are responsible for enforcing as far as who is considered a ♥♥♥♥♥er or not.

Ghosters are violating supercells TOS
Name and shamers are violating supercells TOS

How's the saying go? Two wrongs don't make a right?

You don't have to like their rules, but if you'd like to continue using their free services, you need to follow them.

That's the point chief.