Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Leader (or co-leader) to nominate who goes to war..!

  1. #11
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    21
    I've thought about this too. I think the public/private setting should be the determining factor whether this option should exist or not. In a public clan it's the responsibility of clan leaders to maintain activity of its members. It is more likely in a public clan that the members are unrelated and can't contact each other outside the game, so to coordinate who will be available for war (say participation is at the discretion of the members via a button) would be near impossible (scheduling and time zones and all). If it's at the discretion of the leaders some members would be intentionally left out. But with a clan set to private, there's probably more communication between members. In that case (a private clan i.e. invite only)this feature would be awesome! It would allow a clan to be way mor efficient. But that brings up the question of whether public clans should even battle public ones. Ultimately because private clans would have the potential to put their best war inclined players first, putting them at greater advantage. Thoughts?

  2. #12
    Centennial Club TiaRox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Feet firmly nailed to Foedarati’s clan floor.
    Posts
    147

    Leader (or co-leader to nominate who goes to war

    Quote Originally Posted by tmiles View Post
    I've thought about this too. I think the public/private setting should be the determining factor whether this option should exist or not. In a public clan it's the responsibility of clan leaders to maintain activity of its members. It is more likely in a public clan that the members are unrelated and can't contact each other outside the game, so to coordinate who will be available for war (say participation is at the discretion of the members via a button) would be near impossible (scheduling and time zones and all). If it's at the discretion of the leaders some members would be intentionally left out. But with a clan set to private, there's probably more communication between members. In that case (a private clan i.e. invite only)this feature would be awesome! It would allow a clan to be way mor efficient. But that brings up the question of whether public clans should even battle public ones. Ultimately because private clans would have the potential to put their best war inclined players first, putting them at greater advantage. Thoughts?
    Would it matter if they put their best players in first? Thats where the match-making comes into its own, yes?

  3. #13
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    21
    Yes that's true it doesn't really make a difference if they put their best first. But the criteria for matching clans would have to be way more accurate than matching trophies or experience points. I have no idea what their criteria is and haven't gotten a clear answer on that. But almost every war I've been in (about 15) one clan is totally out-classed by the other. If it wasn't for the variations in participation it would be the rest of the journey towards completely unfair.

  4. #14
    Fresh Spawn
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4

    Well, looks like my opinion has been accepted! lol

    Well, looks like my opinion has been accepted! lol
    Hurray~~~~

  5. #15
    Fresh Spawn
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    1

    Talking Congrats

    Quote Originally Posted by kppoy236 View Post
    Well, looks like my opinion has been accepted! lol
    Hurray~~~~
    Congrats! Your suggestion was accepted

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •