Builder Stacking!

[theOrange77]

I've been thinking about this for a while. Have you ever had spare builders doing nothing, while 1 builder is doing a pesky week-long upgrade? That is fixed with this new feature. You can (for a resource price) place a second builder (sorry, but no 3,4, or5 can work at the same time!) on a building to half the building time. You cannot take him off until the building is completed. This way, you only have to wait 36 hours to get your Town Hall 7!! You could add them anytime during the building process, but cannot have them throw in the towel until their work is done.

Thank you for listening!

P.S. It would give Gremlin some more time to hang out in his builders hut than swinging his hammer around.

[CaptainVentus]

This benefits inactive players too much, I feel like the game should be a little more difficult.

[Saltin]

Hi theOrange77 and welcome to the forums!

Your idea of being able to use multiple builders for one project is great, and would certainly make upgrading easier for players. Unfortunately, however, it's been ruled out by Supercell, probably because players would use multiple builders instead of buying gems, which would cut profits.

Please be sure to read the rest of the ruled out ideas located in the sticky HERE.
Thank you for taking the time and effort to be a part of this wonderful community and posting your ideas for how to make the game better. Clash On!

[vtrpratt]

i like this idea (cuz ya know we've all been there) but maybe it makes the game too easy? its not a real time strategy game afterall. i'm thinkin that the upgrade cost would have to be double to make this fair. additionally, since you have to purchase extra builders with gems, maybe it makes sense if you have to upgrade your builder (using gems) before this ability becomes available?

[theOrange77]

I didn't see it on the blocklist, but I must have missed it. Thx!