thats the way i got my barb king to lv 5 lighting spells...
TH 9
Lv 108
Trophy Record:3222
1/250 Lavas
Status~ Farming
Gg~ 490 mill
FORUMS ACHIEVEMENT LEADERBOARD Click Here"Turn melodies into words, read my biography but also my thoughts"-aTh
The attack on the bottom that is cut off is also a lightning on DE storage attack, but the point is not that I got lightninged just 3 times. I probably have probably lost more DE from lightning attacks than from legitimate raids at this point. My DE storage is already maxed level.
If you don't complain about something that is broken, it won't get fixed. If you get lightninged every other attack you'd be complaining too.
No, I didn't get barbarian king till TH8, before going to TH9 I got BK to level 10 without using lightning on a single DE storage.
The attacker usually don't hold that much DE so I wouldn't make as much a profit for doing the same to them, but I wouldn't do something I'm against anyway. I would raid them legitimately though.
[QUOTE=bandtx;1548090]The attack on the bottom that is cut off is also a lightning on DE storage attack, but the point is not that I got lightninged just 3 times. I probably have probably lost more DE from lightning attacks than from legitimate raids at this point. My DE storage is already maxed level.
If you don't complain about something that is broken, it won't get fixed. If you get lightninged every other attack you'd be complaining too.
No, I didn't get barbarian king till TH8, before going to TH9 I got BK to level 10 without using lightning on a single DE storage.
The attacker usually don't hold that much DE so I wouldn't make as much a profit for doing the same to them, but I wouldn't do something I'm against anyway. I would raid them legitimately though.
its not broken, it's a case of manning up and revenging
Fair point.
Although when we were lowly TH7s we had to pay gold for our spells, and boosting was never an option for 45 mins at 25 gems.
TH7s today have a much cheaper boost option and only have to pay elixir for their spells.
They are getting it much easier then we used to.
That is why I believe it should be changed to a exponential storage loss. It won't eliminate the tactic, but won't make it quite as profitable. To balance for the fact that the tactic is far more common and cheaper today as opposed to 6 months ago.
People like you make me want to zap de even more![]()
GC: Yoloswęg