Is increased barrack boosting contributing to less loot available for most players?

[UnitySharp]

It's possible SC realizes all the potential profit they have lost due to how farmers manipulate the game mechanics, cheap shielding to protect loot. SC has leveled the playing field with these last few updates and the goodies they give us. Most skilled players adapt and continue to adjust the raid strategy they use thus grabbing loot anyway. They don't complain because they don't have easy collector raids to help them "boost" their profile stats. If you are unable to step up like everyone else then quit but don't come on the forums with some self righteous posture as if you're the only one who plays properly, give me a break. Otherwise welcome to a better game that now requires skill, where profile stats are legit(not inflated) and it''s way overdue imho. Certainly don't complain because SC wants to give players that can't be online all the time such as yourself a way to enjoy the game when they are not at work. BTW, SC is a business

Yeah, I am sorry. I guess I just have to adjust and adapt. Only that I have been playing this game for 15 months and the game changed a lot during that time, and I have trouble adapting? Yeah, okay genius.

This idea that boosting... How about more raids occurring equals bases deeper in the queue being pulled forward. Or who's to say that boosters raid any more than non boosters. They both can likely be equal in ammount of raids just different army comps or (shocker) one just raids his 10 per day in half the time as the other.

We don't need you to tell us how to play or why we should play a certain way. TY. Your assertions are self serving so please stop cloaking them in some altruistic endeavor.

I never said I am not self-serving, I even admitted to being self-serving. That doesn't stop a self-serving person from doing something altruistic while trying to achieve his self-serving goal, does it?

And your logic is flawed. Someone who plays a long period of time has his/her raids spread over a longer period of time during which more bases come off shield and become available to attack. And an excessive booster who boosts over a long period of time would drain the raidable bases in the queue every hour. It's the "bandwidth" concept. Assuming all files are of the same size, some one who downloads 2 files per hour over 16 hours does not clog up the bandwidth, while someone who downloads 8 files per hour over 16 hours certain impacts the bandwidth negatively much more. My table above can be expanded to be looking at 1 day instead of 1 hour and then maybe you can understand. At least have some decent intelligence before you start attacking other members of the forum.

Of course people don't need me to tell them how to play in a certain way. That is not what I am doing here. I just want SC to be aware of this issue and gather people's opinion to show them to SC. If that ticks off, too bad, it is just the way it's gonna be.

[ASTINUS]

Yeah, I am sorry. I guess I just have to adjust and adapt. Only that I have been playing this game for 15 months and the game changed a lot during that time, and I have trouble adapting? Yeah, okay genius.



I never said I am not self-serving, I even admitted to being self-serving. That doesn't stop a self-serving person from doing something altruistic while trying to achieve his self-serving goal, does it?

And your logic is flawed. Someone who plays a long period of time has his/her raids spread over a wider time period. And an excessive booster who boosts over a long period of time would drain the raidable bases in the queue even more. My table above can be expanded to be looking at 1 day instead of 1 hour and then maybe you can understand.

Of course people don't need me to tell them how to play in a certain way. That is not what I am doing here. I just want SC to be aware of this issue and gather people's opinion to show them to SC. If that ticks off, too bad, it is just the way it's gonna be.

Yeah, okay genius, many of us have been playing a long time

[UnitySharp]

Yeah, okay genius, many of us have been playing a long time

I know, the issue is not about many of "you", you were talking about me, saying I need to learn to adapt. And my 15 months of playing, going though all sorts of updates this game had, leads to you believing that I don't know how to adapt? Don't waste my time with stupid arguments.

[ASTINUS]

I know, the issue is not about many of "you", you were talking about me, saying I need to learn to adapt. And my 15 months of playing, going though all sorts of updates this game had, leads to you believing that I don't know how to adapt? Don't waste my time with stupid arguments.

Actually, don't waste everyone's time with your stupid argument. Read what I posted, I said most skilled players, not you. It leads me to believe the rest of what I posted, that your stats are inflated, that you're having difficulty adapting to the changes, etc. Get over yourself, everyone else already has

[UnitySharp]

Actually, don't waste everyone's time with your stupid argument. Read what I posted, I said most skilled players, not you. It leads me to believe the rest of what I posted, that your stats are inflated, that you're having difficulty adapting to the changes, etc. Get over yourself, everyone else already has

This is what you said "If you are unable to step up like everyone else...", oh I am sorry, were you talking to someone else, or an imaginary person?

And yeah, me voicing an issue automatically classifies me as someone who cannot adapt, with inflated stats, and that the game has no issues. We should all just shut up and play the game as SC has given us, even though SC has provided this forum to gather player feedback. Is this how you want things done? Well too bad, the world doesn't work this way.

Side note:

And it is funny all the people who launched personal attacks against me kept mentioning the word stats. I believe I have not mentioned this word a single time in this thread. It is NOT important to me, but some ****heads keep suggesting I want big stats or my stats are inflated. Jesus, what if this issue was raised by someone who doesn't have high stats, would these trolls still jump all over that poor guy? It is ridiculous that some people are either jealous or hold grudges about some game stats that was put into the game that was only A YEAR LATE. I am not here to compare stats, can't a player who has real and legitimate concerns come here and have a healthy discussion? What has this forum come to?

[ASTINUS]

This is what you said "If you are unable to step up like everyone else...", oh I am sorry, were you talking to someone else, or an imaginary person?

And yeah, me voicing an issue automatically classifies me as someone who cannot adapt, with inflated stats, and that the game has no issues. We should all just shut up and play the game as SC has given us, even though SC has provided this forum to gather player feedback. Is this how you want things done? Well too bad, the world doesn't work this way.

Side note:

And it is funny all the people who launched personal attacks against me kept mentioning the word stats. I believe I have not mentioned this word a single time in this thread. It is NOT important to me, but some d*ckheads keep suggesting I want big stats or my stats are inflated. Jesus, what if this issue was raised by someone who doesn't have high stats, would these trolls still jump all over that poor guy?

I was talking to you as far as stepping up, but not as a skilled player. I would launch the same attack against anyone who brought this issue up, difference is you have another thread to boycott SC by not boosting or something to that affect. I didn't personally attack you, I may have hit an obvious button with you, well too bad, the real world works that way. I certainly didn't start the name calling though, you did that

[UnitySharp]

I was talking to you as far as stepping up, but not as a skilled player. I would launch the same attack against anyone who brought this issue up, difference is you have another thread to boycott SC by not boosting or something to that affect. I didn't personally attack you, I may have hit an obvious button with you, well too bad, the real world works that way. I certainly didn't start the name calling though, you did that

Well then, when you don't mention name and reply to the thread without quoting anyone, you were technically replying to me. But you shouldn't launch personal attacks to any forum members, that is against forum rules.

"We will not tolerate rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks, harassment, or purposeless inflammatory posts. The moderators and admins decision is final in these matters. Any abuse towards our staff, moderators and/or admins in any form will not be tolerated."

If your issue with me is in the other thread, then you should state it in the other thread, not this thread or you would be messing up your facts and arguments.

[ASTINUS]

Well then, when you don't mention name and reply to the thread without quoting anyone, you were technically replying to me. But you shouldn't launch personal attacks to any forum members, that is against forum rules.

If your issue with me is in the other thread, then you should state it in the other thread, not this thread or you would be messing up your facts and arguments.

Actually, I did reply to the other thread, but it's the same issue(against forum rules). I didn't personally attack you, I reminded everyone of the obvious(SC is a business, manipulation of game mechanics, etc.), you just took it that way, I don't know maybe the shoe fits... Btw, I didn't break any forum rules, you did, thanks for posting them...

[UnitySharp]

Actually, I did reply to the other thread, but it's the same issue(against forum rules). I didn't personally attack you, I reminded everyone of the obvious(SC is a business, manipulation of game mechanics, etc.), you just took it that way, I don't know maybe the shoe fits... Btw, I didn't break any forum rules, you did, thanks for posting them...

That's funny, because I just quoted you saying that you would launch the same attack against anyone. So you would attack anyone who brings up a certain issue on this forum, while the rules of this forum forbids personal attacks? I am confused, do you actually understand the rules?

Originally Posted by ASTINUS
I was talking to you as far as stepping up, but not as a skilled player. I would launch the same attack against anyone who brought this issue up, difference is you have another thread to boycott SC by not boosting or something to that affect. I didn't personally attack you, I may have hit an obvious button with you, well too bad, the real world works that way. I certainly didn't start the name calling though, you did that

[ASTINUS]

This is what you said "If you are unable to step up like everyone else...", oh I am sorry, were you talking to someone else, or an imaginary person?

And yeah, me voicing an issue automatically classifies me as someone who cannot adapt, with inflated stats, and that the game has no issues. We should all just shut up and play the game as SC has given us, even though SC has provided this forum to gather player feedback. Is this how you want things done? Well too bad, the world doesn't work this way.

Side note:

And it is funny all the people who launched personal attacks against me kept mentioning the word stats. I believe I have not mentioned this word a single time in this thread. It is NOT important to me, but some ****heads keep suggesting I want big stats or my stats are inflated. Jesus, what if this issue was raised by someone who doesn't have high stats, would these trolls still jump all over that poor guy? It is ridiculous that some people are either jealous or hold grudges about some game stats that was put into the game that was only A YEAR LATE. I am not here to compare stats, can't a player who has real and legitimate concerns come here and have a healthy discussion? What has this forum come to?

That's funny, I mistakenly used your words....see above...guess I should have posted, "engaged anyone on this debate"...