Proof inactives do get removed!

[Hangar18]

No, she is just lucky enough not to be found or raided.

While that's possible, statistically speaking highly improbable. She got raided consistently once or twice EVERY day until after the one week inactive period. Then nothing for two whole weeks. Something clearly happened as the trophy range was roughly the same before and after - around 1200.

[TheGreatPhoenix]

While that's possible, statistically speaking highly improbable. She got raided consistently once or twice EVERY day until after the one week inactive period. Then nothing for two whole weeks. Something clearly happened as the trophy range was roughly the same before and after - around 1200.

Yes, I believe you. The reason why she didn't get raided is because she went down further the queue, making it so much harder to find her. She isn't removed from queue, but super hard to find. The more inactive you are the harder it is to find you, but you are never removed. I remembered that some people saw town hall 8s without storages, showing sign that base was from super long ago when you could sell storages back in 2012. Some found that late 2013 or early 2014. It's still possible to find, it's just rare. It is possible that she can still be found, it's just hard, but not removed.

[Strider]

Yes, I believe you. The reason why she didn't get raided is because she went down further the queue, making it so much harder to find her. She isn't removed from queue, but super hard to find. The more inactive you are the harder it is to find you, but you are never removed. I remembered that some people saw town hall 8s without storages, showing sign that base was from super long ago when you could sell storages back in 2012. Some found that late 2013 or early 2014. It's still possible to find, it's just rare. It is possible that she can still be found, it's just hard, but not removed.

Lol, SC:

"We would never remove bases from the search queue! Why would you suggest such an awful thing?
(But of course we'll never tell you that after after 1 week the chance goes down by powers of 2 every hour ).
That was a joke.

~ Strider

[Foufoumoro]

So, who here is right?

I am convinced SC do remove inactives. The OP makes a good point... I NEVER see wall spikes.

Bakhoumgeorge is always wrong, don't even think any further.

Of course, yes, inactive players get practically removed from targets pool once they've been inactive for long enough. Don't know if it's really a removal from the pool of target or just chances to get raided going down, all I know is that in the end it's the same result : long-term inactive bases don't get raided for months and months before they get erased from DB.
Even though we'd all love all inactives to remain in the game for loot, that's a logical fact that they remove them, otherwise, months going by, inactive bases would be all over the place and loot would be too easy.

I myself have lots of GC friends who stopped playing, and from what I see, it needs 2-3 months to reach a point where they don't get attacked anymore. -> for 2 months they get raided every 12-16 hours for juicy amounts as their mines and pumps are filling up, an past 2 months or so, their base freeze up in the state it was last raided, and they dont get attacked any more. Then a fair amount of months later they get erased from DB, but I couldnt tell you how long that takes ...

[Teaas]

No, she is just lucky enough not to be found or raided.

SC admitted to this, clever clogs

[TheGreatPhoenix]

Bakhoumgeorge is always wrong, don't even think any further.

Of course, yes, inactive players get practically removed from targets pool once they've been inactive for long enough. Don't know if it's really a removal from the pool of target or just chances to get raided going down, all I know is that in the end it's the same result : long-term inactive bases don't get raided for months and months before they get erased from DB.
Even though we'd all love all inactives to remain in the game for loot, that's a logical fact that they remove them, otherwise, months going by, inactive bases would be all over the place and loot would be too easy.

I myself have lots of GC friends who stopped playing, and from what I see, it needs 2-3 months to reach a point where they don't get attacked anymore. -> for 2 months they get raided every 12-16 hours for juicy amounts as their mines and pumps are filling up, an past 2 months or so, their base freeze up in the state it was last raided, and they dont get attacked any more. Then a fair amount of months later they get erased from DB, but I couldnt tell you how long that takes ...

How are you so sure? I would like to see where SuperCell said that they remove inactives. I'm pretty sure they never said that. Show me proof. Thanks.

[Strider]

How are you so sure? I would like to see where SuperCell said that they remove inactives. I'm pretty sure they never said that. Show me proof. Thanks.

From the TOS.
SUPERCELL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE ANY ACCOUNT THAT HAS BEEN INACTIVE FOR 180 DAYS.
Now that doesn't mean that they do so, but... hm...

~ Strider

[TheGreatPhoenix]

From the TOS.
SUPERCELL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE ANY ACCOUNT THAT HAS BEEN INACTIVE FOR 180 DAYS.
Now that doesn't mean that they do so, but... hm...

~ Strider

180 days isn't 3 weeks. The OP said that the account got removed after 3 weeks. 180 days is a lot different than 3 weeks.

[gorzo93]

SUPERCELL RESERVES THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE ANY ACCOUNT THAT HAS BEEN INACTIVE FOR 180 DAYS.

So... are we not doing the whole reading thing anymore?

[Strider]

180 days isn't 3 weeks. The OP said that the account got removed after 3 weeks. 180 days is a lot different than 3 weeks.

You asked where SC said they removed inactives.
I just answered you :P

~ Strider

How are you so sure? I would like to see where SuperCell said that they remove inactives. I'm pretty sure they never said that. Show me proof. Thanks.