U waist soooo much elixer on troops. But then u attack and its overkill. So u should be able to keep troops that dont take ANY damage. Comment if this is true!
U waist soooo much elixer on troops. But then u attack and its overkill. So u should be able to keep troops that dont take ANY damage. Comment if this is true!
This would take away from the strategy of the game. You would always train your most powerful army, and using every troop, every time. This would not only make attack way more powerful than it already is and, like i said earlier, would take skill out of the game because it would become so much easier to win battles.
no, this is not a sound idea. It would totally unbalance gameplay. I'm a townhall lv 10. Do you want me to cook an all witch army, drop down into bronze league, and unleash them? If I'm careful, they wouldn't take any damage and I could attack again and again and again instantly after the raid is finished. Or I could make an all hog army and heal them after all the defenses are destroyed. Again, if I'm careful they wouldn't take any damage and I could raid again instantly. It wouldn't be fair for the lower level players. The reason troops die at the end of a battle is to prevent this.
exactlyOriginally Posted by TonyRigatoni
also please use the search function, because this idea has been suggested many, many times before
this sig was created by reid! click here for his GFX-service:http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...ee-GFX-Service
This has been suggested so many times before. There is a reason why you lose your troops at the end of a battle as I'm sure other people have explained in a prior post.
i know this isn't really relevant to the suggestion but you mean waste not waist. I'm not even going to start on your use of punctuation.
Posting Permissions
