Dirty little trick

[Cloudsaves]

edit: I thought the general consensus, based on SC posts, were that inactives are pushed further back in the matchmaking que after some inactiveness, and NOT removed before the 180d stated in the TOS. Got any (credible) source saying otherwise?

I am personally saying it's something I have seen(that there seems to be more inactives when I boost). It may be just a coincidence. As far as proof goes I already put up proof with pictures that villages are placed at the back of the attack que after 2 1/2 days. It's in another loot thread. I do need to go boosting today but proving what this thread is claiming would be a much larger undertaking to prove than just proving inactives are being removed. If that makes sense.
I will concede. It probably is a coincidence. It is something I have had happen to me.

[Rastis]

They removed inactives quietly without any fancy sneak peek poster about that, so in a sense this makes sense. After all, if they are thinking they can get away with it, that the audience cannot find it out, then who would not do this?

Say what?

10 ?s

[Daddy]

Boosting does not affect your chances of loot.

Sorry.

[CashClash22]

Boosting does not affect your chances of loot.

Sorry.

I was about to post that haha

[Benny101]

I am personally saying it's something I have seen. It may be just a coincidence. As far as proof goes I already put up proof with pictures that villages are placed at the back of the attack que after 2 1/2 days. It's in another loot thread. I do need to go boosting but proving what this thread is claiming would be a much larger undertaking.
I will concede. It probably is a coincidence. It is something I have had happen to me.

Why is that so big a problem? They did this as long as I can remember. Didn't prevent me from keeping 5 builders busy for the last couple of months, nor from getting all lvl9 walls.

[Rastis]

Boosting does not affect your chances of loot.

Sorry.

Just what someone part of the SC conspiracy would say!

[Cloudsaves]

I was about to post that haha

Yea and the new loot system was promised to make us more loot and for it to help us keep our loot easier as well. We can all see how that turned out.
edit for those that missed what I was insinuating, what sc says cannot be trusted.

[AlphaSite]

Guys, its pretty obvious: This guy is an employee of Supercell trying to get us to boost more

In all seriousness though, before you start throwing around accusations, why dont you actually get some proof other than "try it for yourself". Give us numbers. Numbers never lie(unless the person using them is, but I'd hope you wouldnt fib numbers)...

[Rastis]

Yea and the new loot system was promised to make us more loot and for it to help us keep our loot easier as well. We can all see how that turned out.

There is a difference between implementing a change that doesn't quite work out as well as it was planned, and conspiring against all the company's customers by secretly encouraging them to spend gems to get some hidden perks, wouldn't you say?

[Cloudsaves]

Why is that so big a problem? They did this as long as I can remember. Didn't prevent me from keeping 5 builders busy for the last couple of months, nor from getting all lvl9 walls.

They never, ever removed bases after 2 1/2 days of not logging in previously. Ever. It has only been going on for 2 months.