we should get a loot bonus everytime our defense wins

[Conn0r33]

Loot bonus for defences would be pretty awsome. Only problem is I'm a farmer lol 0 defence wins this week lol

[W4LID]

Wow what a great conclusion man srsly, you are a genius

Why don't you drop to 200 trophies and win every battle to get the league bonus?

GENIUS

thats kind of dum because you wont earn as much and plus they wont even attack u!!

[iDANglin]

Loot bonus for defences would be pretty awsome. Only problem is I'm a farmer lol 0 defence wins this week lol

I don't win many times due to my TH setup, but the few times we do win the bonus wouldn't hurt . In fact, at my current stage in developement, I would move my TH into the middle of my base if this were added. Just sayin' SC, wink wink.

[2Complexx]

There is no league bonus at 200 trophies...

Ouch, would you like some ice with that.

[Herpacleese]

we should get a loot bonus everytime our defense wins

its not like we're asking for clan wars

__________________________________________________
With the above being the original post in this thread...

Why reward players for passive play? Take a maxed TH9 or 10 dropping to sub 200. How much would he be rewarded for the multitude of single barb defensive wins while logged off?

And this being my first response to the OP...

Wow what a great conclusion man srsly, you are a genius

Why don't you drop to 200 trophies and win every battle to get the league bonus?

GENIUS

This is the first mention of the league bonus...

But wouldn't this be the league bonus so it wouldn't be in sub 200

There is no league below 400 trophies, so there would be no bonus.

The OP and my first post in no way mention the leagues in any fasion.

[Herpacleese]

And even Better defences keep you from getting a shield, allowing people to continuously attack you while you're sleeping, at work, etc. allowing losing 1 storage each attack, or every other attack, to add up, until all your CC troops, inferno Tower, Xboxs and traps are depleted and you get worked for a huge amount of loot lost...

Some reward...

Are you saying that you never get a shield because your defenses are that good? If this is the case, you may be to low in the cup range. Consider moving up and joining your contemporaries as I'm sure you'll be receiving your shields then.

This is a great argument. I can't really think of anything other than this to counter the idea of defense win loot bonus. As good of a point this is, I'm not sure why you are against the idea of defense win loot bonus?

SC could easily combat this! One simple suggestion, you don't receive a bonus if the attacker's player level is below 90% of yours. Why 90%? Because people would complain about being a high level and never recieving the boost. People above level 150 shouldn't have a reason to complain because once people get to levels that high, loot isn't a problem. If they donated out the wha-zoo to get their level abnormally high, then they should be mindful. I did not address ever argument you could send my way, but if you think of any, just know that there is always a way to make this feature do-able.

Note that this is just the first suggestion that came into my mind to make this feature fair. Don't react to it as if it's the only possible solution.

I really wish people would think before arguing. Stay classy.

I am against any reward that is given for a passive act, it's that simple.

[daz258]

This should absolutely be included in the game. The notion of 'not been rewarded for passive play' is very shortsighted.

The benefits of such an addition are significant, people should be focusing on that instead.

There are so many high level players who are disinterested in raising above Gold/Crystal leagues as trophies are worthless. Giving a league bonus for winning on defense adds value to having trophies and playing defense.

The game is about attacking AND defending. But in the games current structure trying to win on defense is futle and just costs you. So countless clashers opt to throw town hall out instead.

Do you really think exposed town halls are how the game was intended to be played? I sure as hell don't, it was intended so defense was as important as offense.

It would benefit higher level play too, if you have a chance to win a significant reward of around 100k you would actually try and win a defense more, rather than using any of the numerous tactics to keep yourself out of the attack queue. Fewer players hiding from the queue the better is it for the game.

And the argument of dropping to sub 200...LOL. Either troll or stupid. The league bonuses aren't worth the time of day in Gold or lower. It's about making Crystal and higher more sustainable, helping encourage higher level players to leagues where they are capable of competing but choose not to for better loot.

I think it's a joke that leagues weren't created this way to start with. But been late would be better then never...

[Durham2886]

Did you guys see this thread...the one I spent hours making? It provides a possible solution involving defensive loot capabilities. Feel free to give it a read and bump.




http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...sive-Loot-Idea

[Herpacleese]

This should absolutely be included in the game. The notion of 'not been rewarded for passive play' is very shortsighted.

The benefits of such an addition are significant, people should be focusing on that instead.

There are so many high level players who are disinterested in raising above Gold/Crystal leagues as trophies are worthless. Giving a league bonus for winning on defense adds value to having trophies and playing defense.

The game is about attacking AND defending. But in the games current structure trying to win on defense is futle and just costs you. So countless clashers opt to throw town hall out instead.

Do you really think exposed town halls are how the game was intended to be played? I sure as hell don't, it was intended so defense was as important as offense.

It would benefit higher level play too, if you have a chance to win a significant reward of around 100k you would actually try and win a defense more, rather than using any of the numerous tactics to keep yourself out of the attack queue. Fewer players hiding from the queue the better is it for the game.

And the argument of dropping to sub 200...LOL. Either troll or stupid. The league bonuses aren't worth the time of day in Gold or lower. It's about making Crystal and higher more sustainable, helping encourage higher level players to leagues where they are capable of competing but choose not to for better loot.

I think it's a joke that leagues weren't created this way to start with. But been late would be better then never...

I do agree with the first highlited statement, with the exception that this may give more of a reason for wall farmers to linger in cup ranges well below their contemporaries. With that, the reward would be for passive game play. If that wall farmer were to win defenses against his contemporaries, I'd be all for it, but how to make this system abuse proof, hmmm?

Pas for the second highlighted statement, once again, the OP in no way mentioned this as a league bonus and I replyed with a like response. Please understand context before you accuse one of being a troll or stupid.

[daz258]

I do agree with the first highlited statement, with the exception that this may give more of a reason for wall farmers to linger in cup ranges well below their contemporaries. With that, the reward would be for passive game play. If that wall farmer were to win defenses against his contemporaries, I'd be all for it, but how to make this system abuse proof, hmmm?

Pas for the second highlighted statement, once again, the OP in no way mentioned this as a league bonus and I replyed with a like response. Please understand context before you accuse one of being a troll or stupid.

The first point is immaterial. You really think a wall farmer would put their hall inside of their base instead of leaving it out in the open? Leaving them self in the matchmaking queue for a substantially longer period of time to win bad league bonuses of 5,200 or 8,400 gold/elixir? I doubt it.

The longer they linger there out in the open the far greater chance they will get hit by low level players with lightning - which will cost them far more gold or dark elixir, where none is rewarded in gold leagues. Or have a greater chance another high level farmer will find them and crush them.

The benefit of more players playing proper defense/not hiding in high leagues outweighs the paltry free income that would be generated in low leagues; which is hardly risk free.

And my point of been a troll or stupid is actually on the money. Anyone with average intelligence would know that is most likely what he was referring to. Yet you still choose to make a cheeky post on the small possibility he meant otherwise. So troll refers to you there sir.