we should get a loot bonus everytime our defense wins

[Ollyhicks]

Great idea, like winning an attack

[HopeInDarkness123]

maybe but you couldn't get it from a th4 loosin if you are th8

[Squian2]

No we shouldn't. SC should not reward passive play.

There is nothing special about winning a defense. It requires little intervention on your part other than copying a decent base layout and is completely dependent on your attackers sucking (or deliberately losing).

It also would be very easily exploited by the player community. Town hall sniping is gated by shields. Defense wins would not be.

It would add something more to defenses, after all, spending so much gold on and time on upgrading defenses could be rewarded more.

[Herpacleese]

It would add something more to defenses, after all, spending so much gold on and time on upgrading defenses could be rewarded more.

Better defenses allow you to potentially lessen your loss during a raid. There's your passive reward.

[Khaleeq]

Wow what a great conclusion man srsly, you are a genius

Why don't you drop to 200 trophies and win every battle to get the league bonus?

GENIUS

There is no league bonus at 200 trophies...

[PenguinClasher]

Better defenses allow you to potentially lessen your loss during a raid. There's your passive reward.

And even Better defences keep you from getting a shield, allowing people to continuously attack you while you're sleeping, at work, etc. allowing losing 1 storage each attack, or every other attack, to add up, until all your CC troops, inferno Tower, Xboxs and traps are depleted and you get worked for a huge amount of loot lost...

Some reward...

[ShinySeblind]

100% agree

[Cadcool2]

But wouldn't this be the league bonus so it wouldn't be in sub 200

[iDANglin]

Why reward players for passive play? Take a maxed TH9 or 10 dropping to sub 200. How much would he be rewarded for the multitude of single barb defensive wins while logged off?

This is a great argument. I can't really think of anything other than this to counter the idea of defense win loot bonus. As good of a point this is, I'm not sure why you are against the idea of defense win loot bonus?

SC could easily combat this! One simple suggestion, you don't receive a bonus if the attacker's player level is below 90% of yours. Why 90%? Because people would complain about being a high level and never recieving the boost. People above level 150 shouldn't have a reason to complain because once people get to levels that high, loot isn't a problem. If they donated out the wha-zoo to get their level abnormally high, then they should be mindful. I did not address ever argument you could send my way, but if you think of any, just know that there is always a way to make this feature do-able.

Note that this is just the first suggestion that came into my mind to make this feature fair. Don't react to it as if it's the only possible solution.

I really wish people would think before arguing. Stay classy.

[Gunnermatt]

Why reward players for passive play? Take a maxed TH9 or 10 dropping to sub 200. How much would he be rewarded for the multitude of single barb defensive wins while logged off?

There is no league below 400 trophies, so there would be no bonus.