My Builder Idea (Don't Judge Based On Title)

[glorywarrior]

I like this because at my level everything is so expensive I never have all my builders going at once. this fixes that.

[iDANglin]

This idea has been ruled out by supercell because they won't make as much money

It has? They wouldn't??

[iDANglin]

Has this been noticed by SC yet?

I honestly dont know, BUT they should have by now! any time ive been on here, this is on the front page!!!

If it has then mission accomplished As long as it's at least considered I'm ok with that!

I like this because at my level everything is so expensive I never have all my builders going at once. this fixes that.

Yeah I'm about to hit TH 10 and I don't see myself playing enough to maintain all of my builders!

[Isaacium]

I don't believe the forum says anything against this idea. Yes, it does rule out multiple builders on a building, upgraded builders and so forth, but it does not rule out this.

[RtEWeirdo]

I love the idea. It is a way for SC to get money ( builder huts purchased) and a way for lower levels mostly but everyone to get resources overall. If this is implemented props to you! Great thread, well constructed

[AxionXD]

While the idea offers supercell a way to earn, I don't think it offsets the amount they lose.

Their biggest sale, from what I heard, is Gemming uprades, especially at high level

By allowing a building upgrade, which say costs 800 gems to upgrade 100% faster (instant), be upgraded in half the time for any less than 400 gems, they're losing money. You can't compare collector or barracks boosting to building boosting. Barracks boosting costs 10 gems but gemming the troops themselves instantly costs a few dozen gems, maybe 30-40? Not much difference in profit loss.

But builder boosting for any less than maybe 200 gems for just double upgrade speed would not be practical to supercells bottom line.

Supercell is a business, when suggesting ideas you have to consider the overall costs to add a feature. Both upfront programming cost and losses to their current bottom line.

[iDANglin]

While the idea offers supercell a way to earn, I don't think it offsets the amount they lose.

Their biggest sale, from what I heard, is Gemming uprades, especially at high level

By allowing a building upgrade, which say costs 800 gems to upgrade 100% faster (instant), be upgraded in half the time for any less than 400 gems, they're losing money. You can't compare collector or barracks boosting to building boosting. Barracks boosting costs 10 gems but gemming the troops themselves instantly costs a few dozen gems, maybe 30-40? Not much difference in profit loss.

But builder boosting for any less than maybe 200 gems for just double upgrade speed would not be practical to supercells bottom line.

Supercell is a business, when suggesting ideas you have to consider the overall costs to add a feature. Both upfront programming cost and losses to their current bottom line.

Sorry mate I'm just confused, you know that my idea is not related to boosting upgrades? That sort of topic has been ruled out for solid reasons. I think your first statement about how this idea might not affect SC's earning could be possibly true, but my logic concludes that at worst it wouldn't lose them money. I'd assume that it would have them make money for many reasons.

Thanks for the feedback

[iDANglin]

I don't believe the forum says anything against this idea. Yes, it does rule out multiple builders on a building, upgraded builders and so forth, but it does not rule out this.

Yeah I check every once in a while to make sure this idea hasn't been added to the ruled out list but added to the list of ideas considered. Nothing yet!

I love the idea. It is a way for SC to get money ( builder huts purchased) and a way for lower levels mostly but everyone to get resources overall. If this is implemented props to you! Great thread, well constructed

Thank you much! Glad you agree that it would be a beneficial addition for all

[Isaacium]

While the idea offers supercell a way to earn, I don't think it offsets the amount they lose.

Their biggest sale, from what I heard, is Gemming uprades, especially at high level

By allowing a building upgrade, which say costs 800 gems to upgrade 100% faster (instant), be upgraded in half the time for any less than 400 gems, they're losing money. You can't compare collector or barracks boosting to building boosting. Barracks boosting costs 10 gems but gemming the troops themselves instantly costs a few dozen gems, maybe 30-40? Not much difference in profit loss.

But builder boosting for any less than maybe 200 gems for just double upgrade speed would not be practical to supercells bottom line.

Supercell is a business, when suggesting ideas you have to consider the overall costs to add a feature. Both upfront programming cost and losses to their current bottom line.

This thread is about boosting mines and collectors, not builder boosting. I think you are confused...

[iDANglin]

This thread is about boosting mines and collectors, not builder boosting. I think you are confused...

Lol thank you sir!