View Poll Results: What Should The Boost Be? (Read OP First!!!)

Voters
596. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2.0 production boost with gem stack up to 3.0!

    243 40.77%
  • 1.5 production boost with gem stack up to 2.5!

    118 19.80%
  • Less than 1.5 boost!

    33 5.54%
  • More than a 2.0 boost!

    39 6.54%
  • I can't read!

    163 27.35%
Page 26 of 39 FirstFirst ... 16242526272836 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 260 of 389

Thread: My Builder Idea (Don't Judge Based On Title)

  1. #251
    Forum Elder iDANglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Code of Conduct
    Posts
    2,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Isaacium View Post
    lol, but seriously, the thread needs more comments. Right now, I'm all out of ideas of improvement. Someone else have any?
    Haha, yeah it might be a dying thread but that's ok I'm sure someone from SC took a glimpse at some point!

  2. #252
    Forum Elder iDANglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Code of Conduct
    Posts
    2,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Mormononfire View Post
    This is the reason Clash of Clans is still amazing because of people like you who dedicate their time and effort to come up with these amazing ideas! Keep up the good work.
    Thanks! I'm glad it has been liked!

  3. #253
    Forum Elder iDANglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Code of Conduct
    Posts
    2,235
    Hope to see this in this week's sneak peeks!

  4. #254
    Fresh Spawn
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3
    +1. Great idea, mate. C:

  5. #255
    Forum Elder iDANglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Code of Conduct
    Posts
    2,235
    Quote Originally Posted by vikingvlacic View Post
    +1. Great idea, mate. C:
    Appreciate that, thanks!

  6. #256
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Planet earth.
    Posts
    996

    Builder boosting

    Not sure i agree with a builder being placed on a mine or resource for "free." But maybe I am misunderstanding...

    Are you suggesting any time a builder is inactive he can be placed on a resource absolutely free with NO cost and it will boost? Because then everyone would do it constantly. We all have times when we do not have all builders active. Usually while we are accumulating a resource to be able to use the builder actually... It should always cost something to boost something. You cant get something for nothing you know.

    Lets use gold for example...

    To me, if a builder is being placed on a mine, it should cost something for the boost in gold generation. Maybe it should cost Elixir? And if you do it, then it should be for a set amount of time. Much like Gem boosting really. And stopping the builder boost before the allotted time should also have a penalty.

    Dont get me wrong, i would love if we could double up builders to speed up a build, or an upgrade, AND for this idea of boosting resouce creation. But it should cost something.
    clan: Wiggy wildlings
    Psycho oixie, Founder.


  7. #257
    Centennial Club Cyrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    124
    Has this been noticed by SC yet?

  8. #258
    Centennial Club aguy0802's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Raiding your base and stealin your dark elixir to feed to my barbarian king :P
    Posts
    101

    Idk...

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrand View Post
    Has this been noticed by SC yet?
    I honestly dont know, BUT they should have by now! any time ive been on here, this is on the front page!!!



  9. #259
    Forum Elder iDANglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Code of Conduct
    Posts
    2,235
    Quote Originally Posted by kristinepixie View Post
    Not sure i agree with a builder being placed on a mine or resource for "free." But maybe I am misunderstanding...

    Are you suggesting any time a builder is inactive he can be placed on a resource absolutely free with NO cost and it will boost? Because then everyone would do it constantly. We all have times when we do not have all builders active. Usually while we are accumulating a resource to be able to use the builder actually... It should always cost something to boost something. You cant get something for nothing you know.

    Lets use gold for example...

    To me, if a builder is being placed on a mine, it should cost something for the boost in gold generation. Maybe it should cost Elixir? And if you do it, then it should be for a set amount of time. Much like Gem boosting really. And stopping the builder boost before the allotted time should also have a penalty.

    Dont get me wrong, i would love if we could double up builders to speed up a build, or an upgrade, AND for this idea of boosting resouce creation. But it should cost something.
    I understand your concern about this idea not costing anything resource wise, but for almost any CoC player who plays more than rarely, the cost of the builder's time would be more than enough. If this feature had come out let's say a year ago, I don't think I would have used the feature more than a few times since then. Why? Because like many players I am able to keep all of my builders busy at all times. The few times I can't would be the few times I would use this feature. So in my opinion this feature would rarely be useful for hardcore players, but used more for players who have struggles getting the resources for upgrades. This feature would also be useful for players who are capped or simply want to focus on walls. Sure, a player might choose to use this feature for every builder as much as possible, but then they don't get any buildings upgraded. With that in mind I don't find this feature to be "OP."

    You aren't the first to suggest a resource cost by any means, but I find a resource cost to increase that resource's income to be redundant. The one thing I am against here is a cost of one resource to boost the other resource's income. That's closely related to the very common idea players have of "resource trading" which I am aware that SC is very much so against. Appreciate your post and I hope this all makes sense!

  10. #260
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    55
    This idea has been ruled out by supercell because they won't make as much money

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •