Why do some people hate more loot?

[drayrti]

Then you don't understand the different connotations of the statement. Too bad.

People like you annoy me to no end with their condescending holier than thou attitude. You like storage raiding and detest those who farm mines? Who cares? Just go play the game rather than insulting others for playing a certain way. We get it, you're on a separate, much higher plane of existence than us drivel, now please stop flaunting this and either contribute to the thread in a positive manner or just go play Clash without flaming others.
Back on topic:
Not sure why there are those who fly into an outrage when new mine/collector levels are suggested. Since every little bit of loot (ok there's a loot bonus, but not that much) is generated by mines and collectors, why wouldn't increasing loot input help?

[stupidgame67]

Srry for any noobiness found in this post, but I agree there should be more inactive bases, however, I don't think majority of our raids are on inactives. This game would then be too easy, and fly through it fast. Supercell would also lose money because people would buy less gems to speed up the process.

[rjdofu]

One must assume you mean this point, as I think it is the only statement that may be considered as such? And no, you continue to fail to see my point even though I have been repeating it. I would prefer if the bases are left out so then everyone playing is on the most equal playing field when it comes to loot. Equal in the sense that there will be much fewer of these freebies to snatch up. Then people would be forced to battle the good ol' fashioned way to progress.

Don't worry, I will only ever raid a freebie if there is more than 500k and this rarely happens anymore so your freebie stash is safe. BUT, even me raiding the occasional freebie does not contradict my statements as I'm simply saying that I wouldn't mind if many more abandoned bases taken out of the system which forces people to do more than farm them in order to progress.

I hope this is more understandable as I don't feel like repeating the same point once again.

And I'll repeat my original point again, people don't have to play the way you play. Without the inactives, you're happy, many are unhappy. With the inactive,you can still be happy, many will be happy. Well unless you take joy in watching people struggling and unable to enjoy the game (which is what I'm getting from your response so far), then I have nothing to talk to you.

Me personally, I don't give a damn about challenge or pretentious sh#t like that. I see good base, I raid, regardless whether it's in the storage (teh challenge!!!1!) or collectors. Unlike you, I understand why people are frustrated.

So once again, cut the ♥♥, go play the game the way you wanna play, and let other play the game the way THEY wanna play.

[Terraist]

People like you annoy me to no end with their condescending holier than thou attitude. You like storage raiding and detest those who farm mines? Who cares? Just go play the game rather than insulting others for playing a certain way. We get it, you're on a separate, much higher plane of existence than us drivel, now please stop flaunting this and either contribute to the thread in a positive manner or just go play Clash without flaming others.
Back on topic:
Not sure why there are those who fly into an outrage when new mine/collector levels are suggested. Since every little bit of loot (ok there's a loot bonus, but not that much) is generated by mines and collectors, why wouldn't increasing loot input help?

I'm very honestly not trying to flame this convo, or other people. I just get tired of people (in this case the popular opinion on a certain subject) telling the forum boards that they are speaking for everyone, or for the CoC masses. Then, when others such as myself reply in the opposite manner we are the ones getting insulted.

You say who cares to my opinions and go on to flame me even more. So why is this acceptable to do to me, but if I give dissenting opinions to others without direct insult it is not?

I agree with you and others that the loot bonus is bunk and not really a big help (although I've not been higher than Masters 2 so can't comment any further than that) as for the input you are talking about, I'm not sure if you are saying the input (or raid percentage) per mine should be higher, or if you are talking about leaving more abandoned mines in place total. If the first then yes, by all means raise either, but if the second then you already know my thoughts.

[youngthegreat]

Srry for any noobiness found in this post, but I agree there should be more inactive bases, however, I don't think majority of our raids are on inactives. This game would then be too easy, and fly through it fast. Supercell would also lose money because people would buy less gems to speed up the process.

Totally agree. I understand SC. Not bunch, but more inactive bases could make both happy,
because clashers who enjoy this game are potential gemers.

[drayrti]

I'm very honestly not trying to flame this convo, or other people. I just get tired of people (in this case the popular opinion on a certain subject) telling the forum boards that they are speaking for everyone, or for the CoC masses. Then, when others such as myself reply in the opposite manner we are the ones getting insulted.

You say who cares to my opinions and go on to flame me even more. So why is this acceptable to do to me, but if I give dissenting opinions to others without direct insult it is not?

I agree with you and others that the loot bonus is bunk and not really a big help (although I've not been higher than Masters 2 so can't comment any further than that) as for the input you are talking about, I'm not sure if you are saying the input (or raid percentage) per mine should be higher, or if you are talking about leaving more abandoned mines in place total. If the first then yes, by all means raise either, but if the second then you already know my thoughts.

I'm not flaming you. I'm telling you to quick calling people greedy and lazy when YOU choose to raid in a more difficult way. If you choose to do that, that's your own choice, but we sure as heck don't want you whining at us that we're a bunch of greedy, lazy, players.
And by increasing input I meant to add a new mine level, thus increasing the total loot input into the economy. I do think that increasing the loot bonus by a lot is probably the way to go though tbh. Even if there was more input, people would still dump all their gold on walls thus making loot just as difficult to find. Having much higher loot bonuses would encourage large raids (having only a small loot bonus for one star and a much larger one for 2 and 3* respectively would also stop TH sniping for easy loot) because players would know they would get a guaranteed amount of loot if they won.

[youngthegreat]

I'm very honestly not trying to flame this convo, or other people. I just get tired of people (in this case the popular opinion on a certain subject) telling the forum boards that they are speaking for everyone, or for the CoC masses. Then, when others such as myself reply in the opposite manner we are the ones getting insulted.

You say who cares to my opinions and go on to flame me even more. So why is this acceptable to do to me, but if I give dissenting opinions to others without direct insult it is not?

I agree with you and others that the loot bonus is bunk and not really a big help (although I've not been higher than Masters 2 so can't comment any further than that) as for the input you are talking about, I'm not sure if you are saying the input (or raid percentage) per mine should be higher, or if you are talking about leaving more abandoned mines in place total. If the first then yes, by all means raise either, but if the second then you already know my thoughts.

Your words and what you did do not go together.


1. I already asked you why did you take those free bases and happily use those to max your TH7, 8?


Why didn't you skip and enjoy your mental challenge back then when there were tons of inactive bases.
You needed it. right? everyone did.


2. Why can't you skip those bases now? (Instead why do you want them out of the game)

You've replied it's because people should play with equal environment. And how is it equal. You took all
the inactive advantages until now and how is it equal to you and players who are now maxing their
TH7 and 8.

[Terraist]

And by increasing input I meant to add a new mine level, thus increasing the total loot input into the economy. I do think that increasing the loot bonus by a lot is probably the way to go though tbh. Even if there was more input, people would still dump all their gold on walls thus making loot just as difficult to find. Having much higher loot bonuses would encourage large raids (having only a small loot bonus for one star and a much larger one for 2 and 3* respectively would also stop TH sniping for easy loot) because players would know they would get a guaranteed amount of loot if they won.

Agree with you 100% Not sure if SC will ever implement another level to mines and collectors but I'm sure no complaints would come up. Well, there are always complaints, but it would be very limited. I've always said the TH needs to be worth something, anything really then people would stop leaving them out for easy shields. Maybe one day.

[Muscleman]

I am th9 and I'm getting good loot. The system should not change. I won't want to see everyone with level 9^ walls.

[Benson822175]

I constantly say that most people that complain of the loot are premmie or wrong range or dont know how to farm. Premmies cant attack lower TH cuz of the bonus and arent strong enough to compete with same TH levels. Wrong range = No loot. Dont know how to farm = leave TH in while in a farming range, using a 200k army with 3-4 spells to farm then complain of no loot to cover costs.

1. Their TH is lower than 8. Usually 7 or lower or relatively newbie to this game -TH9, was a maxed TH8

2. They had some lucky raid recently - ​Recently, yes. lucky, maybe. consistently, yes


3. They do not need resource anymore - Nope, still working on TH9

4. They love challenges, obstacles and pressing next. -Love challenges, yes. Pressing next 10-20, I can deal with that

5. Son of god Luck - I barch. Every 10-20 clicks, I can get a good collector raid or a storage raid with them on outer layers. Army costs under 50k every time and I dont always use it all. 20 clicks is about 18-20k. Return is far higher


6. SC or their workers or fan boys - Love the game but not a fan boy. Spent $0 and lvl 98 almost 99

7. Who are you. Why do you not want inactive bases? - Never said it or see anyone say it. Inactives obviously come from people that stopped playing, so... You cant create them or something. Most ive seen someone say is that it is not a reliable source for the COC community to depend on them
Sorry, I dont fit any of these.