
Originally Posted by
2222
It takes place over the course of a full week and is only one attack per day? Anyway, you don't need one attack wars to have good classic wars below th13. Millions of players take part that aren't th13. Th13 is needed for clan wars at all.
No one is suggesting the longer search times would result in better matches. Instead, because the number of clans in the search pool would be reduced, the longer search times would be needed just to get the same matches we have now. The more clans in the pool, the easier it is to find an even match. That is why even matches (and faster) are often easiest to find at 10v10 and 15v15 (the most popular war sizes). Take clans out of the pool and the quality of matches goes down, not up.
All that said, I don't know that a one attack format would be all that bad as long as it was only an option. The only two negatives I can think of is worsening matches (due to less clans to match with) and perhaps reducing the fun/excitement of CWL. One of the things that makes me look forward to CWL is the switch to one attack wars (and by the end of the week I'm looking forward to classic wars again). I could see CWL lose some of its "shine" if millions of players were doing one attack wars all month long.
In summary, I don't think it is a terrible idea, even though I definitely disagree with your stated reasons for wanting to have it as an option. (It is a good thing when the enemy drops down and attacks low right away, not a bad thing. It increases your chance of winning since they are potentially wasting attacks.) It is an idea that has been suggested many times in the past and it isn't a bad one.