Sandbox Mode with GREAT DETAILS!!!!! Detailed and in- depth!!!!!

[Reid]

Good idea +1

[JSpong]

Great idea, but should be free of charge. Neither anyone in my clan or myself would use this feature if it charges.

[Julezwatts]

Great idea, but should be free of charge. Neither anyone in my clan or myself would use this feature if it charges.

Must I again quote post 6?

As I have said before and as is now in the thread:

You have a great advantage from being able to test your base with having the risk of losing trophies or resources.

If you weren't able to test your base layout in sandbox mode, the only way you'd find out what weaknesses it has would be if someone destroyed you...

Sandbox mode is a strategic convenience in that it allows you to run your base through a 'proof of concept' and have the risk factor reduced to zero.

I think that the gems are well worth it compared to the resources you are liable to lose from testing it the other way...

[JSpong]

I realise it is a great tool for players to use and is well worth the price, regardless, that price is so steep for players who do not buy gems. Regardless, most players who do not purchase gems are very hesitant in using them, typically saving for one gem boost events. To reiterate, this is a great tool that should be available to EVERYONE. Otherwise, start charing for the village edit as well.

[Julezwatts]

Seriously? you think that 1 gem for 20 troops is too pricey? Be aware that you can only attack using the maximum troop capacity of an army camp (240).

The maximum amount of gems that you'd have to spend is 12 gems. I can get 12 gems by clearing 6 obstacles. If you want, I'll lower it to 1 gem= 30 troops, and then we get most gems=8.

I totally understand what you're getting at, but village edit mode doesn't offer you a strategic advantage.

OR

How about this:

Sandbox mode just costs the regular amount of gold that it would cost to search in multiplayer. If the multiplayer search cost is 1000 gold, then the cost to use sandbox mode is 1000 gold. Sound good?

[justinhu]

Great execution of a usually bad idea

[owene]

Please read!

I dont wanna spend gems on my base. Here's my idea. You can test your base, you get 240 troops ( you dont have to use 240). You can use whatever troop you want and any level. (You can chose what level you want your troops individually).

[JSpong]

The point of our argument is moot, my opinion on not charging gems is simply based on defending players like myself who do not purchase. No doubt, many players will use the feature either way, I just don't believe in paying more to a company that is clearly well off. The gold fee would be better, yes, but I believe this feature should be free of charge. I understand for the sake of a gold sink, this may be required.

[Julezwatts]

The point of our argument is moot, my opinion on not charging gems is simply based on defending players like myself who do not purchase. No doubt, many players will use the feature either way, I just don't believe in paying more to a company that is clearly well off. The gold fee would be better, yes, but I believe this feature should be free of charge. I understand for the sake of a gold sink, this may be required.

I changed it from costing gems to costing the amount of gold it takes to search in multiplayer battles. Thanks for the input!

[Julezwatts]

Please read!

I dont wanna spend gems on my base. Here's my idea. You can test your base, you get 240 troops ( you dont have to use 240). You can use whatever troop you want and any level. (You can chose what level you want your troops individually).

Okay...

I changed it from costing gems to costing gold, and I stated that you can have as many troops as you want up to 240, and what level troop.