End of Valley Diamond Rewards changed from 40 to 30 😡

[Nestof3]

Meaning it needed adjusting because Supercell couldn’t afford to give away ten diamonds. Obviously Supercell felt over two weeks of working through a valley wasn’t worth 40 diamonds. There is no other good reason. The diamond rewards do not affect any other aspect of the game.

I find Supercell the LEAST generous, so we clearly play differently games.

It’s possible it did need adjusting. We, as players, don’t have that information. Obviously SC thought this to be a better option.

As far as their generosity, I find HD to be more generous than other games.

If you choose to open the piggy bank, yes, you can get 2 of the big prizes if you have enough tokens for both.

At least we have 3 very nice choices without spending diamonds.

[Nestof3]

Decoration buyers, at least me, are happy to get some diamonds.

One farmer's sorrow, another farmer's joy. Can't please everyone.

The post was about reducing the number of diamonds. I think we can agree that 40 diamonds is better than 30, so the one farmer’s joy statement doesn’t apply.

[Nestof3]

Exactly. I simply cannot understand how those who have played this game for any decent amount of time do not see this trend.

Another try to limit free diamonds and push players into buying more. Of course it needed adjustment. Like anything else introduced lately by SC, for the same purpose: force them to buy more diamonds.

More free fuel??? I have read somewhere that the cost doesnt decrease with the time any more but could not vouch for this since i have stopped buying anything, even for 1 diamond.

Chill derby??? But of course: take additional task every day for 2 diamonds (i.e. 14 per week) for lame prizes.

I used to be a very eager player and never sorry to support the game by regular purchases of diamonds. But lately everything new introduced is directed into forcing players to spend more and more and more.

Well, with me it has directly opposite effect: i spend less and less. I disengage Tom, i dont take additional tasks in derbies and never ever take and pull boats. Still playing here and there, while searching for another game, where the developer will be a bit less greedy.

[LynnK2015]

The post was about reducing the number of diamonds. I think we can agree that 40 diamonds is better than 30, so the one farmer’s joy statement doesn’t apply.

Yes, I agree that 40 diamonds is better than 30 diamonds. But my goal isn't getting diamonds but rather the exclusive decoration. The icing on the cake is the extra 10 diamonds I will get this time.

Getting 10 diamonds is better than getting no diamonds in my case. It should be interesting to see if Team Hay Day will continue with this trend or revert to 40 diamonds and decoration with no diamonds for the next installment of the Valley.

---
Lynn, Clasher, Farmer, and now also Boomer
April 27, 2020

[BULIGO]

Yes, I agree that 40 diamonds is better than 30 diamonds. But my goal isn't getting diamonds but rather the exclusive decoration. The icing on the cake is the extra 10 diamonds I will get this time.

Getting 10 diamonds is better than getting no diamonds in my case. It should be interesting to see if Team Hay Day will continue with this trend or revert to 40 diamonds and decoration with no diamonds for the next installment of the Valley.

---
Lynn, Clasher, Farmer, and now also Boomer
April 27, 2020

They will not revert back. They cater more for the "deco lovers" because those players tend to spend cash for decorations with abandon, thus more appealing to the company than the..er..."freebooters". That is so obvious and understandable.

[Nestof3]

The only reason we deco people spend cash on deco is because Supercell is so stingy with it. We used to get it using coins or diamonds and on the rare occasion an event. Now the great stuff is always sold in decor diamond packages. I remember the days I bought diamond packages. Now, it’s always a decor package, and the decor is ridiculously expensive.

Personally, I’ve found the valley decor ugly.

They will not revert back. They cater more for the "deco lovers" because those players tend to spend cash for decorations with abandon, thus more appealing to the company than the..er..."freebooters". That is so obvious and understandable.

[LuvHayDay]

Personally, I’ve found the valley decor ugly.

I agree. I love decorating my farm, but I think all of the valley decorations are stylized in such a bizarre way that I wouldn’t put them on my farm if they were given to me free. I really wish SC would offer different styles of Valley decorations to suit different tastes.

[ninagrozdanovic]

I agree. I love decorating my farm, but I think all of the valley decorations are stylized in such a bizarre way that I wouldn’t put them on my farm if they were given to me free. I really wish SC would offer different styles of Valley decorations to suit different tastes.

Same here.