Should the match cost be scrapped?

[skulstad99]

Im using much more than 4-5 nexts each raid after the update. To get a good base with lots of loots im searching around 10 times.

[001rens001]

a 3rd and a 4th option ; either reduce it by 50% or keep it at 100 gold or something for all TH lv's

[Benson822175]

Why do you keep making such an unfair personal attack on me? How do you know I being picky? You haven't even been in my situation.

Even if you are not picky, I bet you on average click "Next" 4-5 times at least! Now think about it, if you are at town hall 10, that means you are paying (4 x 1,000) 4,000 gold per raid on average. Say if you raid 5 times a day, then you are paying 20,000 gold. After a week, you will actually lose 140,000 gold!

So? You should easily be able to afford that if you aren't a premature TH9 or 10... most people get around a million gold a day or more if they raid 5 times a day. If you are trophy pushing then you better be ready to pay for it, in fact most pushers complain about the lack of elixir rather than gold. And many people who don't know what they are doing, wrong range or 150k elixir troops to farm or premature town hall complain about the loot system or the searching cost

[yodoloto]

a 3rd and a 4th option ; either reduce it by 50% or keep it at 100 gold or something for all TH lv's

As I've explained before, there's not much room for reduction. Plus, small reduction will be ineffective. But I like your idea of keeping it at a certain level for everyone. I like it, but I'm not sure about the others, some might say it's unfair, etc..

[NS2]

I admire your determination

[ThatoneguyIknow]

lol yeah I know it should be taken down for sure

I'm patiently awaiting mods to close this. . .

[yodoloto]

I'm patiently awaiting mods to close this. . .

Why should this thread be closed, just because a few of you keep messing around here?

if you have nothing to contribute, please just go away.

[Jazzathegreat]

How did i end up in global chat with all these kids fighting?

[sharkie]

haha the poll result...

[001rens001]

As I've explained before, there's not much room for reduction. Plus, small reduction will be ineffective. But I like your idea of keeping it at a certain level for everyone. I like it, but I'm not sure about the others, some might say it's unfair, etc..

why would it be ineffective, in your post i have seen that your best point is that the total cost is to high, with a reduction off 50% you pay way less.

and why would the reduction be unfair.

just let other people have their own ideas,instead off being so desperate in your orginal idea.
it's getting anoying after a while