Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Is the cap of 50 Members in a clan to low?

  1. #11
    Forum Veteran Rak2180's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Limits like fear are often just an illusion
    Posts
    1,657
    I don't see any harm in increasing clan size for higher level clans as a clan perk

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    300
    Supercell is consistent in promoting the development of new clans, whether we like it or not. They adjusted the clan search so now most of the clans are new.

    This is why they will never add more perks or space in clans. More perks or space makes it so more top players are sucked into fewer clans, stifling new clans.

  3. #13
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    NE England, UK.
    Posts
    2,422
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevinwhit View Post
    Supercell is consistent in promoting the development of new clans, whether we like it or not. They adjusted the clan search so now most of the clans are new.

    This is why they will never add more perks or space in clans. More perks or space makes it so more top players are sucked into fewer clans, stifling new clans.
    But top players are never likely to join a new clan anyways, unless it is a spin off set up by top players in the first place.
    A new clan is inevitably going to struggle in the early days.
    I dont really care whether they increase the numbers, but it is likely to have little effect on a newbie, since there are almost inumerable to choose from anyway

    Quote Originally Posted by gregenstein View Post
    It's really not too low. It might be not good for the handful of elite war clans and such, but a change like this would also have to be good for the middling clans with .500 or worse war records.

    It is insanely hard to get any kind of decent players if you aren't already established and have a YouTuber or social media expert or whatever. It's also insanely hard to build a clan from scratch.

    I'd be OK if there was some kind of "visitor spots" that you can stop in, use the chat, and watch war replays or live attacks, but not do things like Friendly Challenge or donate/request troops. Of course can not be included in any type of war either. That's about as far as I'd go where normal clan roster is 50 but you can also like maybe 5-10 visitors.
    Visitor spots sounds like a good compromise.
    I wouldnt see a problem with them donating troops tho, since anyone in war is free to come and go anyway to find troops.
    Last edited by joshsgrandad; 4 Weeks Ago at 09:38 PM.

  4. #14
    Millennial Club gregenstein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    old headz retirement home
    Posts
    1,046
    It's really not too low. It might be not good for the handful of elite war clans and such, but a change like this would also have to be good for the middling clans with .500 or worse war records.

    It is insanely hard to get any kind of decent players if you aren't already established and have a YouTuber or social media expert or whatever. It's also insanely hard to build a clan from scratch.

    I'd be OK if there was some kind of "visitor spots" that you can stop in, use the chat, and watch war replays or live attacks, but not do things like Friendly Challenge or donate/request troops. Of course can not be included in any type of war either. That's about as far as I'd go where normal clan roster is 50 but you can also like maybe 5-10 visitors.
    old headz - A place for adults to gather, chat, drink, and clash! Learn more about us at https://oldheadz.wordpress.com/

    Find us in Clash: old headz (#2VVQVLCV). Adult clan for War and Clan Games.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •