Clash of Clans - BH9 Dev Update Video - When Pigs Fly!

[Luicetarro]

Ok so how long u think its gonna take to destroy 6th builder in war like 0,005 seconds? Ill be more worried about those new mortar lvls then extra bh that doesnt even attack u

It's not about the time it does take to destroy a hut, it about the % it will add, while lowering the % all other buildings will net.
Would you be happy to lose a clanwar on stars, since all 2 stars of the enemy does have the hut and you're rewarded with less % because of that and lose the war?

[wotanwaton]

I would not be supprised if the new builder building is something that is not available to place on a war layout.
So this issue would be moot.

this would be the best solution.

[M0rningStar]

Nice idea, I’ll pass it along

I am max th11, and my builder hall is level 4, so far behind, too far behind, i think if that happens, i have no option but to quit, the game.

The grind to upgrade from bb 4--> 9 or higher!!! too painful

[Luicetarro]

this would be the best solution.

Absolutely and I could second that.
I'm playing the BH and will get the 6th builder one day. But at the same time I don't want it to be an advantage over ppl that aren't using it. And by advantage I'm not concerned about upgradetimes.

[GodlyMortal]

Thats not quite what I was saying.

Of course a player can progress faster with extra builders. No one in their right mind would claim otherwise.
However.
My point is, it’s being made much bigger then it actually is because, some players can’t afford gold pass for example and they will progress slower then gold pass players, or players who buy the occasional special deals with books and such to progress faster.
This is a similar thing and at least this could be obtained for free so the playing field is quite even. It’s not like the game is saying you can’t have this.

I understand what your point is. My argument is a rebuttal of your point because it is a big advantage. You claimed it wasn’t huge because it’s basically like 4 builders rather than 5. I am pointing out that that is a big advantage so you should use another argument.

[2222]

I would not be supprised if the new builder building is something that is not available to place on a war layout.
So this issue would be moot.

That is a good point and I also wonder how it would impact FC cool downs?

[M0rningStar]

I would not be supprised if the new builder building is something that is not available to place on a war layout.
So this issue would be moot.

That would be great, fingers crossed.

[Kaptain Kat]

You can’t if you don’t spend time playing something you don’t like

I will tell you this, but shhhh don’t let the other know.
bb isn’t exactly my thing either, so quite frankly I understand some people don’t like it. I’ve neglected it too and have some catch up to do for sure.
And even if I were to choose to completely ignore it then I still don’t find this a huge problem. I wouldn’t feel hugely disadvantaged. The playing ground is fair and there’s nothing others can get which I couldn’t.

[GodlyMortal]

I never said it wasn't faster. But in the end, the rewards (max heroes, max troops) are no different. You obtain nothing "extra" of meaningful impact. You can still max your heroes and troops, whether or not you play BB.

In the end, your account will have little flames on level 65 heroes whether or not you play BB. You just have to do it without a gem mine, and now without a 6th builder.

I fail to see how this is some evil scheme to ruin your fun.

Except you do obtain something extra with meaningful impact. It’s called another hut you have to destroy to three star.

[Kaptain Kat]

The staff at supercell, just before builder hall was released, when they were promoting it.

They said you could play it or ignore it.
that hasn’t changed.