Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Possibility to run multiple CWL’s in one clan?

  1. #11
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammad80 View Post
    So I brought this idea up a while ago, but I think it’s worth mentioning again (in a thread this time).

    With 50 members in a clan, I think there should be the ability to run 1-3 CWLs in a clan. That way, 45 members can participate.
    So you can have upto 3 teams of 15 members each.

    Now as for the rewards, they could be adjusted. The only rewards we need to adjust here are clan XP. That can be made 1/3 max possible per league for running 3 leagues, 1/2 max possible for running 2 leagues, and the the way it is now if a clan only decides to do 1 CWL.

    Only members in their specific CWL can donate to the bases on their CWL, clan members from other CWL’s are only able to watch battles/scout in the CWL’s different from theirs (and for other such aspects, apply the same logical reasoning).

    Now in terms of the rankings, that’s where I might need some help from you guys.
    What I was thinking is that each CWL within a clan has different rankings, and only the highest ranking out of them is the clan’s overal ranking.
    And in order to avoid higher up TH’s going to the lower CWLs of their clans to get easy loot, we can make it so that if a clan decides to do only 1 or 2 CWLs, it will place them in the CWL’s that are the highest in their clan first.
    So for example, if a clan ends a season with CWL’s at Gold 1, Crystal 2, and Champions 2, and then they only decided to do 2 CWL’s next season, then they will be placed in their Champions 2 and Crystal 2 CWL. If they only do 1, they will be placed in their highest CWL (Champs 2).
    This way, even if clans decide to put their stronger members in lower CWLs and weaker in higher CWLs, then they will sacrifice the ranking of their highest CWL (thus negating any abuse of the system).


    I’m open to suggestions, and please read the whole thing first before commenting. Thank you!
    Wanna run 3, theres a simple solution make two other clans and put 15 in each one. There problem solved.

  2. #12
    Forum Veteran SumoSloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,915
    Quote Originally Posted by DJluv2013 View Post
    Wanna run 3, theres a simple solution make two other clans and put 15 in each one. There problem solved.
    Obviously that's an option, albeit not really a great one. What that means is that the clan is split up for the week, it means loss of access to the clan perks to those who have left the clan. It means that gaining access to higher troop levels is potentially a giant pain in the butt for those who have left. So while your solution is simple, it doesn't mean it's very good.

  3. #13
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by SumoSloth View Post
    Obviously that's an option, albeit not really a great one. What that means is that the clan is split up for the week, it means loss of access to the clan perks to those who have left the clan. It means that gaining access to higher troop levels is potentially a giant pain in the butt for those who have left. So while your solution is simple, it doesn't mean it's very good.
    No they wont have maxed troops in their defending war cc unless someone with maxed is in the clan, but they can easily go to main clan for troop donations when they are attacking.

    People are making this harder than what it needs to be. We have a clan of 50, I included everyone on the roster, then made a feeder for the lower th so they could do regular cw in that while the others did cwl. My clan luckily isnt full of a bunch of cry babies that realistically understand that if im a th7 i wont be much help against a th10 but i can still earn medals and war else where.

    Hell i even included my main in the feeders clan war so they could have higher lvl troops in their war cc's.

    Bout time CWL finishes i would have had participated in 10 different wars over a 8 day time span.
    Last edited by DJluv2013; December 21st, 2018 at 07:30 PM.

  4. #14
    Forum Veteran SumoSloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,915
    Quote Originally Posted by DJluv2013 View Post
    No they wont have maxed troops in their defending war cc unless someone with maxed is in the clan, but they can easily go to main clan for troop donations when they are attacking.

    People are making this harder than what it needs to be. We have a clan of 50, I included everyone on the roster, then made a feeder for the lower th so they could do regular cw in that while the others did cwl. My clan luckily isnt full of a bunch of cry babies that realistically understand that if im a th7 i wont be much help against at th10 but i can still earn medals and war else where.

    Hell i even included my main in the feeders clan war so they could have higher lvl troops in their war cc's.

    Bout time CWL finishes i would have had participated in 10 different wars over a 8 day time span.
    Good for you, I'm not sure how calling other people crybabies is contributing to the discussion, but if it works for you, that's nice, I'm happy for you. It doesn't work as well for other people, so instead of thinking they are the only people that matter, they are proposing solutions and trying to come up with ideas to improve the game. (Kinda the opposite of what you do)

    There are flaws with your idea which I've already pointed out, if you choose to ignore those, fine so be it, but don't assume that because you don't have a problem with it that nobody else should, it's an ignorant way to look at things.

  5. #15
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by SumoSloth View Post
    Good for you, I'm not sure how calling other people crybabies is contributing to the discussion, but if it works for you, that's nice, I'm happy for you. It doesn't work as well for other people, so instead of thinking they are the only people that matter, they are proposing solutions and trying to come up with ideas to improve the game. (Kinda the opposite of what you do)

    There are flaws with your idea which I've already pointed out, if you choose to ignore those, fine so be it, but don't assume that because you don't have a problem with it that nobody else should, it's an ignorant way to look at things.
    My crybabies remark is referring to the ones that said they have members complaining about not being able to war during cwl but they can maybe not in cwl but they can still war.

  6. #16
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by SumoSloth View Post
    Good for you, I'm not sure how calling other people crybabies is contributing to the discussion, but if it works for you, that's nice, I'm happy for you. It doesn't work as well for other people, so instead of thinking they are the only people that matter, they are proposing solutions and trying to come up with ideas to improve the game. (Kinda the opposite of what you do)

    There are flaws with your idea which I've already pointed out, if you choose to ignore those, fine so be it, but don't assume that because you don't have a problem with it that nobody else should, it's an ignorant way to look at things.
    The only "problem you pointed out was troop lvl in defending war cc's, and that could easily be taken care of by having a higher up clan mate included in that war. It is possible to do cwl and regular clan war at the same time.

    There are many solutions to said problem the issue is people want the one they think would work instead of trying other things out. Of course people will possibly be mad if you as a clan is selfishly making the decision to only run your top instead of giving others the chance.

    We've been including everyone we could realistically include no im not going to run a th5, but i did have at least 1 th7 in each war didnt make a huge difference for us until war 4 when the lowest th the clan we faced that day was a th9 so we was heavily out matched. Lost that war by 8 but we are still in first place.

    The only thing cwl has shown is others greed, news flash winning isnt everything it is just a game after all.
    Last edited by DJluv2013; December 21st, 2018 at 07:47 PM.

  7. #17
    Forum Veteran SumoSloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,915
    Quote Originally Posted by DJluv2013 View Post
    The only "problem you pointed out was troop lvl in defending war cc's, and that could easily be taken care of by having a higher up clan mate included in that war. It is possible to do cwl and regular clan war at the same time.

    There are many solutions to said problem the issue is people want the one they think would work instead of trying other things out. Of course people will possibly be mad if you as a clan is selfishly making the decision to only run your top instead of giving others the chance.

    We've been including everyone we could realistically include no im not going to run a th5, but i did have at least 1 th7 in each war didnt make a huge difference for us until war 4 when the lowest th the clan we faced that day was a th9 so we was heavily out matched. Lost that war by 8 but we are still in first place.

    The only thing cwl has shown is others greed, news flash winning isnt everything it is just a game after all.
    Actually you're the one who pointed out the defending ccs troops as a problem, I never said anything about that. You also seem to be fixated on this idea of running a regular war alongside the cwl, which has nothing to do with what the op suggested and does nothing to solve the issue of having others compete in the cwl. You can call it greed if you want, however I see it differently. What it's doing is prohibiting a portion of the clan from taking part in the activities throughout a week. That to me has nothing to do with greed but rather a poorly implemented system of exclusion.

    In many of your posts, you make assumptions that people don't already use your "simple solutions" which are nothing more than a band-aid fix to a larger problem. Many people do what you are suggesting, they're not new suggestions, nor are they unique, what they are also not is good solutions.

    News flash for you, it's a game, a game that has flaws which could be improved upon, hence the reason for suggestions by many forum goers. Like I've said before if things work good for you then fine, congratulations, but know that you're not the only one who plays the game and not everyone agrees with your acceptance of the status quo mediocrity.

  8. #18
    Pro Member PROFIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    689
    We made a second clan for all of our minis. Big dogs stayed home and minis got to play in the new clan. Max TH12s stop by to fill attacking clan castles and then go home.

    We set this up for the 2nd CWL season. We just got the clan to L3 after yesterday's war. Soon it will be more self-sufficient other than needing siege machines from outside.

    No need to make overly complicated within-clan schemes for multiple concurrent CWLs. Setting up a mini clan isn't that hard. Nice bonus: CWL in silver is a bunch of gimme wars as long as you participate. We are looking to finish this CWL 6-1 and in first place overall, earning our second promotion since inception, mainly because we used all 15 every war and the enemy did not.
    the truth shall set you free.
    All max everything on both sides of the pond.
    July 2018 - 6059 trophies, #2077 global!
    100% F2Per

  9. #19
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    189
    Going to provide an alternative idea that is likely much easier to implement.

    Sub-clans:

    A sub-clan is like a normal clan now except that it is linked to other clans that share chat/donations/clan level. Sub-clans however war separately. Total clan size is still 50 but you could spread those 50 out across some number of sub-clans.

  10. #20
    Millennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    1,320
    Quote Originally Posted by SumoSloth View Post
    Actually you're the one who pointed out the defending ccs troops as a problem, I never said anything about that. You also seem to be fixated on this idea of running a regular war alongside the cwl, which has nothing to do with what the op suggested and does nothing to solve the issue of having others compete in the cwl. You can call it greed if you want, however I see it differently. What it's doing is prohibiting a portion of the clan from taking part in the activities throughout a week. That to me has nothing to do with greed but rather a poorly implemented system of exclusion.

    In many of your posts, you make assumptions that people don't already use your "simple solutions" which are nothing more than a band-aid fix to a larger problem. Many people do what you are suggesting, they're not new suggestions, nor are they unique, what they are also not is good solutions.

    News flash for you, it's a game, a game that has flaws which could be improved upon, hence the reason for suggestions by many forum goers. Like I've said before if things work good for you then fine, congratulations, but know that you're not the only one who plays the game and not everyone agrees with your acceptance of the status quo mediocrity.
    It would be prohibiting if the 15 was a set line up the whole entire time, but that is not the case. Players can be swapped in and out everyday supercell made it this way for a reason.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •