
Originally Posted by
2222
It wasn’t a rhetorical question, I’m really wondering if anyone took the time to try to analyze the benefits of starting lower or higher as my clan needs to decide this as well.
I did somewhat, based purely on rough guesses as to where my clan will end up. We are discussing whether to include some heavier bases which are weak attackers or leave them out and be more successful. The result is it's difficult to call for sure, the break even point for us would be about a 2 win difference between a higher tier and a lower tier (which may be not be as far fetched as it may seem based on our attackers, depending of course entirely on matchups)
Note*** this is based purely on my clans makeup and guesstimating where we will end up within both situations. The other factor we are considering is whether we should split our lower bases off as they will have no chance of warring within this structure. as a result they are completely at the mercy of whether we win wars or not as to their rewards. So if we include all our top bases (which have some weak attackers) and lose the majority of our wars, those on the outside may be sitting without anything at all.