Necessary Limitations for attacking!

[Noeabe]

-Somebody who is level 62 destroyed my whole base and I'm only level 38.
-Please, make a map so people don't get attacked as soon as their shield goes down!
-Also, limit the level to attack someone to 10 levels apart.
-It isn't fun when your ALWAYS being attacked, maybe cut down attack rate by 50% by doubling the shield time.

Thank you for reading post.

[Julezwatts]

-Somebody who is level 62 destroyed my whole base and I'm only level 38.
-Please, make a map so people don't get attacked as soon as their shield goes down!
-Also, limit the level to attack someone to 10 levels apart.
-It isn't fun when your ALWAYS being attacked, maybe cut down attack rate by 50% by doubling the shield time.

Thank you for reading post.

1: That's how attacking works: People who are better than you (But level 62 seems a bit unfair) will destroy your base. They get the same amount of loot if it were a level 38 who destroyed your base.

2: Not sure what you mean, but if this means that you are allowed to choose the player that you attack, it's been ruled out.

3: sounds feasible.

4: I think less of an increase would be appropriate, but I like the concept.

[Dread]

no, they don't get the same amount of war bonus, the war bonus is also subjected to the raiding plenty system. I used my high level account and low level one to test it

[Wafflesaregoodforyou]

no, they don't get the same amount of war bonus, the war bonus is also subjected to the raiding plenty system. I used my high level account and low level one to test it

A post in the wrong place at the wrong time xD!