Thread: Leeches.... Leeches everywhere!
While I agree it is a clan management thing and I do kick the free loaders what really annoys me is the players that I try recruit and they join just to complete a challange for rewards.
This past war we had a couple do that then when we actually recruited some good players they could not compete in clan games as 50 players had already started them.
Made 50k but it was a struggle, over 15k last day
Here we go again 😂😂
So, you want to set minimum CG points to get max rewards. What happens when your Clan crosses the max tier because of someone who is below your threshold to recieve max rewards? Would you be happy to have the points for said clanmate reversed and no one got the top tier rewards? Or do you want to benefit from your clanmates contribution and withhold it from them?
As said by others, it is a clan management issue. You may create more issues for many clans if you want to make the points and tiers more complicated.
Just make something like "complete n tasks to get this tier reward". Easy fix, wont be based on points. Or make something like "complete 1 100 point task/a 400 point task and a 35 point task for getting full rewards from the completed tiers" or something.
Speaking as a Clan leader for over 3 years of an all adult clan, it would be nice for SC to give us more tools to manage our clans.
After a Clan War, we can review player's performances, Clan strategy for targets, suggest changes to either or both.
After Clan Games, we cannot see who donated how many points unless someone can screen capture the data and share on our kik group.
Having the ability/option to set a minimum threshold, bonuses for those who max, and a review option would stop all these threads by allowing us leaders to manage the Clan properly.
Because we are all adults with real world commitments we always set our targets at the second highest tier, but usually reach the top because the usual suspects like grinding, although we are suffering burnout, and wish the games were only twice per month as was the most popular choice on the SC poll which seems to have been ignored.
A qualified Engineer since 1985 - use engineering analysis and strategy in everything I do.
Is that a multi target Ferno up there Ben? No Bill, it's just a infrared heat lamp.
Try some "healing" factor 50 to protect you.....
We already have it, Games Champion achievement is used for that, so when you trying to recruit new player you can used that as consideration to accept/reject.Originally Posted by Flobber
I didn't see any benefit for ability to set minimum point requirement to get reward. You must know that not everybody that playing this game is an adult. There are a lot of leader/co leader who practically is just a 10 - 15 years old kid. Imagine if they tried to troll their clanmate with set their minimum point at 2000/3000? So everybody must reaching max point to get a reward.
Giving player ability to set minimum point requirement will make CG more complicated and i think this is why SC never applied this.
I do agree about some people getting burn out of this repetitive clan games, but let's be realistic, if you can't afford to get max reward in every single CG just be it. Don't push yourself to hard for just playing a game.
A big part of clans is helping folks advance and achieve. Yup, I’d like to see who did what. Mainly to give more encouragement after the end of a Clan Game to those who show up late if I am not around or just busy. I just do not understand a whole series of rules for clan management as to who gets what after a clan game. As I said above, are you willing to forgo cetain contributions from folks who get to the second from top tier but did not reach your top tier requirements for points earned? What if that cost the clan the top tier?
One of the stated design goals for Clash of Clans is simplicity. Setting up rules about minimums for Clan Game tier rewards would not meet that design goal.
Last edited by Everettreef; March 27th, 2018 at 09:40 AM.
1. YES, having it disappear right after you choose rewards is kinda perplexing.
2. So would thread about people complaining about free loaders/frequency etc
3. I also find it odd how the results of the poll never came into fruition. However, 4 day once a week was 2/3rd highest so good enough for SC? I'm STILL a fan of less frequent CGs but when you word "My clan and I have burnout from weekly CGs, we would like them to be less frequent" as "Since my clan no longer has the stamina/endurance/tenacity to fulfill the maximum point requirements, we want other capable clans to also be denied the chance for these rewards. Despite easily being able to ignore the clan games which we feel cause burnout, we choose not to and instead, impose our incompetence onto other clans as a result." It really makes you think.
That perspective really changed my perspective
#39
Agreed, the tab with individual achievements should still be visible after the end of the games.
While I don't think this necessary, I have no objection to a settable threshold provided it defaults to zero and is optional.Having the ability/option to set a minimum threshold, bonuses for those who max, and a review option would stop all these threads by allowing us leaders to manage the Clan properly.
There was no clear preference for frequency on that poll, but if there were, it would still have probably been ignored as being a ridiculously tiny self selecting sample. And it was also run much too early to be of real value - when the poll was set up, there had only been about 3-4 games, and none had a duration of anything but 2 or 4 days.Because we are all adults with real world commitments we always set our targets at the second highest tier, but usually reach the top because the usual suspects like grinding, although we are suffering burnout, and wish the games were only twice per month as was the most popular choice on the SC poll which seems to have been ignored.
Thanks TerMinus Prime for the sig pic
We even have a few players who only make 50 - 200 points in the CG. And not once, but every single time.. It's a litte annoying, yes. But we can still use those points to reach the last tier and in the end it's just a game. Not worth whining for. In every clan there will be players who take more benefits then they deserve..
We only kick inactive players since it isn't that easy to find new active players.
