Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 75

Thread: Minimum points required to collect rewards

  1. #1
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    100

    Minimum points required to collect rewards

    The co / leader sets minimum number of points all members need to hit in clan games. If the target isn't met they don't get the rewards simples.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    2,049
    Quote Originally Posted by BobNudd View Post
    The co / leader sets minimum number of points all members need to hit in clan games. If the target isn't met they don't get the rewards simples.
    Does that also mean that the clan doesn't get the points

  3. #3
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Somethingnotalreadypicked View Post
    Does that also mean that the clan doesn't get the points
    The clan gets the points but the player not the rewards!

  4. #4
    Fresh Spawn
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    9
    Supercell! System of clan games? Unfair

    SUPERCELL PLEASE READ AND ANSWER PLEASE!

    What I am going to say I know that many have already said, and many also said that you do nothing to fix it, that you do not care.

    SUPERCELL, set up the gaming system.

    If you were a normal player like us, you had the normal clan, nothing popular, You and some people make their 3000 points for the clan games, and some people make 50, 100, 200 points, and at the end of the games, they win the same prize as you !!!!!! You think that's fair? IS NOT FAIR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    SUPERCELL, you have to understand, that 70% of the clans do not have enough players for the complete games, which is why we invite people to join the clan for the games, but these people know that if they make 100 points, will get the same prize that the person does 3000 thousand points.

    it is no use expelling the person who does not play the games, because they know that they will receive the prize that the clan reaches, where the clan gets very disorganized.



    PLEASE SUPERCELL.

    MY IDEA!!!!
    *** Everyone is required to score a minimum of 1000 points in the games in order to win the prize.
    *** Even those strong clans that close the maximum prize score, example (50,000 points), people who did not have 1000 points should continue to do to get the prize.


    In this way, the games are fairer for all players.
    Many clans are tired of people entering the clan saying they will help in the games, and only makes 100 points and leaves the clan or no longer does any mission.
    These games are helping to make clans confused and in and out of players at all times.
    If you have a minimum score to win the prizes, this way players help more in games and participate more.

  5. #5
    Forum Champion
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Bad Newz, VA.
    Posts
    5,581
    Here is a quote from Supercell on this topic:

    It is not in our interest to involve ourselves with how each Clan manages its members. As we've said before, the Clan Games are a team effort, not an individual one. It doesn't matter if a Clanmate contributes 50 points or 1500 points, everyone is entitled to the tiered rewards that the entire Clan earns. The Clan Games are not a means to measure how well you do within your own Clan; it is up to your Clan's leadership to responsibly manage who should be allowed in the Clan if there are contribution requirements. It is also that Clan's responsibility to communicate those expectations. These are the burdens leaders must bear if they want to carry the mantle of Leader or Co-Leader.

    If you feel a member is not pulling their weight, then it is that Clan's responsibility to make the necessary changes to that Clan's roster if they feel it is necessary. If you put a player in a Clan War and they do not use both attacks, do you just let it slide or do you take action against that person, whether it is booting them or simply letting them know to use their attacks? The same goes for the Clan Games. We put a new feature in-game with a goal of increasing Clan participation - but we intentionally didn't put in a requirement of how much someone should participate simply because we recognize that not everyone is able to participate as much as others.

    All of the rewards benefit your Clan as a whole. The faster someone progresses, the more that person fees like the Clan is investing in them, and the result is a higher likelihood of them increasing their participation when they are able.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    2,049
    Quote Originally Posted by BobNudd View Post
    The clan gets the points but the player not the rewards!
    That seems wrong why should the clan still get the points and the player that contributed to the results doesn't get anything?

  7. #7
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    2,213
    Quote Originally Posted by Somethingnotalreadypicked View Post
    That seems wrong why should the clan still get the points and the player that contributed to the results doesn't get anything?

    It doesn't only just 'seem' wrong .... it 'is' wrong.

  8. #8
    Don't get me wrong, I love the clan games and the loot. However, the set up simply invites strife and ill-will in clans. It's a deep part of human nature to be disgusted with free loaders. When you struggle and sweat to make the 3000 and then see a whole batch of people who only did one challenge yet reap that same hard-earned reward, it's infuriating. The impulse in our clan leadership is to go through the list and boot all these folks. We haven't done it yet, but it will probably happen. Some of these people are otherwise decent clan-mates. So what was Clash of Clans intent here? To make clans argue and shrink until everyone in the clan is on the same page re: clan game participation?
    Last edited by MsDinosaur; March 12th, 2018 at 06:49 PM. Reason: Grammar

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    85
    Instead of setting a point limit to receive rewards maybe allow the leader/co-leader to set point requirements for each individual tier...for example in order to receive tier 1 rewards you must contribute 50 points minimum... in order to receive tier 2 rewards 200 points minimum in order to recieve tier 3 rewards 400 points and so forth donít make it mandatory allow leadership to set the options as they deem necessary along with the option for there not to be any minimum point requirements.
    Last edited by Farley44; March 12th, 2018 at 07:14 PM.

  10. #10
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,684
    Quote Originally Posted by MsDinosaur View Post
    Don't get me wrong, I love the clan games and the loot. However, the set up simply invites strife and ill-will in clans. It's a deep part of human nature to be disgusted with free loaders. When you struggle and sweat to make the 3000 and then see a whole batch of people who only did one challenge yet reap that same hard-earned reward, it's infuriating. The impulse in our clan leadership is to go through the list and boot all these folks. We haven't done it yet, but it will probably happen. Some of these people are otherwise decent clan-mates. So what was Clash of Clans intent here? To make clans argue and shrink until everyone in the clan is on the same page re: clan game participation?
    And how about the benefit those clan members gain to their abilities perhaps for war performance.

    I permit our war participants to not grind as much in CG as we benefit as a clan with them getting stronger.

    However if they are also the type of person to opt out of war as well the. Thatís a different matter and they can move along.

    No need for a minimum points requirement though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •