Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 70

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Whats with the stupid potions supercell 😡

  1. #41
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by michelms View Post
    Answer me please if the potions are maxing the heroes level...
    Do you really think it's only necessary max troops to make good attacks? Don't you forget about the heroes and the potions, don't max them.

    Peace out ☮️
    Well I'd say a rushed or engineered th11 base with warden is really OP to the th10 matchup that base gets. Even though BK and AQ of th10 are higher. Max hero's aren't necessary for an advantage.

  2. #42
    Junior Member 1kingslayer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    68
    they should change the power potion mechanic so that it doesnt affect wars
    i mean it will not work in wars only in multiplayer and versus battles
    Last edited by 1kingslayer1; February 10th, 2018 at 05:22 PM.

  3. #43
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripple1972 View Post
    Not to answer for Chang. But I believe he is saying you have the same base for war and multi. It’s not like you can engineer acwar base, but play multi with a maxed base. But nice non answer to all his points.
    That's common sense, no? I've said that multiple times already. My point, is why doesn't SC implement the ability to have your war base separate. You can already to it all in design mode, except for being able to save it. Then anyone could engineer a lot more equally with greater longevity for when things change. I love the passive aggressive behavior some folks, like you ripple, pull here. Why not ask him why he only addressed parts of what I asked and not others?

    Either way, you CAN design a war base engineered to your hearts desire RIGHT NOW with base editor. The thing you CAN'T do is save it. If SC really wanted to make it fair for all, they simply need to make it so people can SAVE said war base and use THAT base for war.

    Otherwise get better at matching engineers against engineers, because it's still not good enough.

  4. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Parking lot of Grateful Dead show
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by karmakay View Post
    That's common sense, no? I've said that multiple times already. My point, is why doesn't SC implement the ability to have your war base separate. You can already to it all in design mode, except for being able to save it. Then anyone could engineer a lot more equally with greater longevity for when things change. I love the passive aggressive behavior some folks, like you ripple, pull here. Why not ask him why he only addressed parts of what I asked and not others?

    Either way, you CAN design a war base engineered to your hearts desire RIGHT NOW with base editor. The thing you CAN'T do is save it. If SC really wanted to make it fair for all, they simply need to make it so people can SAVE said war base and use THAT base for war.

    Otherwise get better at matching engineers against engineers, because it's still not good enough.
    I don’t need to address what Chang says because he tends to be logical. You tend to rant at something, and when someone disagrees you change topics.

    Why not not play the game as it is presented. Everyone who says the game would be better if SC made changes, should either design their own perfect game or adapt. That is a major difference in engineer’s vs. you. We adapted to a bad matchmaker. If SC makes changes that make what we have done a disadvantage, we will adapt.

    You rarely see any of the intelligent engineers complain about we got out engineered. You do see a lot of the newly, poorly engineered do this. They are the ones to get back to the OP’s question are the ones who benefit from potions. I run a couple engineered bases never needed or never will need a potion.

  5. #45
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripple1972 View Post
    I don’t need to address what Chang says because he tends to be logical. You tend to rant at something, and when someone disagrees you change topics.

    Why not not play the game as it is presented. Everyone who says the game would be better if SC made changes, should either design their own perfect game or adapt. That is a major difference in engineer’s vs. you. We adapted to a bad matchmaker. If SC makes changes that make what we have done a disadvantage, we will adapt.

    You rarely see any of the intelligent engineers complain about we got out engineered. You do see a lot of the newly, poorly engineered do this. They are the ones to get back to the OP’s question are the ones who benefit from potions. I run a couple engineered bases never needed or never will need a potion.
    The adapt or quit mentality. Lol there it is!! Another I do this, so it must be okay. How many people that are your average/normal players have MULTIPLE engineered war bases?? If engineers could just deal with straight Matchups and not resort to looking for advantages, we wouldn't have the war matchmaking problem. I fully expect SC to drop a few updates that will hopefully make it so you engineers can face other engineered bases while leaving people who attack straight up to be matched against each other. Sounds like the perfect plan to me. Allow those who find a need to manipulate for what? Ego?, especially with multiple war accounts, to be able to face other such bases. Allow people who just play the game without trying to "be a smart engineer" to play others who have no need or desire to manipulate war Matchups. I'm curious if this happens, how many so called good engineered attackers will be here complaining that their multiple engineered bases no longer work? I bet there will be a few. Then I can use the tried and true, adapt or quit. Id love to say hopefully I see you in war, but it would be a lie.

    Hopefully you and your fellow engineers get to have long hard wars against each other's calculating minds. Where the fair advantage you all claim to seek, is there and truly fair in Matchups.

  6. #46
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripple1972 View Post
    I don’t need to address what Chang says because he tends to be logical. You tend to rant at something, and when someone disagrees you change topics.

    Why not not play the game as it is presented. Everyone who says the game would be better if SC made changes, should either design their own perfect game or adapt. That is a major difference in engineer’s vs. you. We adapted to a bad matchmaker. If SC makes changes that make what we have done a disadvantage, we will adapt.

    You rarely see any of the intelligent engineers complain about we got out engineered. You do see a lot of the newly, poorly engineered do this. They are the ones to get back to the OP’s question are the ones who benefit from potions. I run a couple engineered bases never needed or never will need a potion.
    Also, what was Darien talking about with SC ID? The writing of that question and response made it seem against the rules to have multiple accounts. Does that mean here on forum? Or multiple accounts like you have for war bases?
    It has to be the former, because if it's the latter WAY to many people are breaking rules right now.

  7. #47
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Parking lot of Grateful Dead show
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by karmakay View Post
    The adapt or quit mentality. Lol there it is!! Another I do this, so it must be okay. How many people that are your average/normal players have MULTIPLE engineered war bases?? If engineers could just deal with straight Matchups and not resort to looking for advantages, we wouldn't have the war matchmaking problem. I fully expect SC to drop a few updates that will hopefully make it so you engineers can face other engineered bases while leaving people who attack straight up to be matched against each other. Sounds like the perfect plan to me. Allow those who find a need to manipulate for what? Ego?, especially with multiple war accounts, to be able to face other such bases. Allow people who just play the game without trying to "be a smart engineer" to play others who have no need or desire to manipulate war Matchups. I'm curious if this happens, how many so called good engineered attackers will be here complaining that their multiple engineered bases no longer work? I bet there will be a few. Then I can use the tried and true, adapt or quit. Id love to say hopefully I see you in war, but it would be a lie.

    Hopefully you and your fellow engineers get to have long hard wars against each other's calculating minds. Where the fair advantage you all claim to seek, is there and truly fair in Matchups.
    Please show me where I said adapt or quit? You have an amazing ability to pivot and deflect, I hope you get to use that in your chosen career.

    Quote Originally Posted by karmakay View Post
    Also, what was Darien talking about with SC ID? The writing of that question and response made it seem against the rules to have multiple accounts. Does that mean here on forum? Or multiple accounts like you have for war bases?
    It has to be the former, because if it's the latter WAY to many people are breaking rules right now.
    I am not Darian, and have no ideas what you are asking. Multiple accounts have never been against TOS.

  8. #48
    Forum Legend Piper139's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    9,668
    Quote Originally Posted by karmakay View Post
    Also, what was Darien talking about with SC ID? The writing of that question and response made it seem against the rules to have multiple accounts. Does that mean here on forum? Or multiple accounts like you have for war bases?
    It has to be the former, because if it's the latter WAY to many people are breaking rules right now.
    There is a pilot, in Finland I believe, with a supercel id as a way to save your account. It would make multiple accounts on one device easier. There is nothing in the terms of service about having multiple accounts but it has been stated that it is at your own risk and no support will be provided. I would like the supercel id as I could dump this second Google play account I have just to backup coc. I connected my son's first device to my play account and he started coc then quit. No way to switch it to my base so had to create second account.

  9.   Click here to go to the next staff post in this thread.   #49

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    19,338
    Quote Originally Posted by karmakay View Post
    Also, what was Darien talking about with SC ID? The writing of that question and response made it seem against the rules to have multiple accounts. Does that mean here on forum? Or multiple accounts like you have for war bases?
    It has to be the former, because if it's the latter WAY to many people are breaking rules right now.
    Multiple accounts have always been permitted in game. But until now, multiple accounts on one device have not been supported (although they were still permitted).

    The Supercell ID (which has now been rolled out to some other countries) will mean that in future, multiple accounts on one device are actually supported as well as permitted.

  10. #50
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Piper139 View Post
    There is a pilot, in Finland I believe, with a supercel id as a way to save your account. It would make multiple accounts on one device easier. There is nothing in the terms of service about having multiple accounts but it has been stated that it is at your own risk and no support will be provided. I would like the supercel id as I could dump this second Google play account I have just to backup coc. I connected my son's first device to my play account and he started coc then quit. No way to switch it to my base so had to create second account.
    That would make things a lot easier. I struggle with login and password as it is. Lol I was going to say it would be bad to not be able to do multi accounts if one wanted.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •