Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47

Thread: Clan losing morale in war due to unethical play

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    3

    Clan losing morale in war due to unethical play

    Three wars in a row, our matchups have been like this, or similar.

    Our side:
    5 th10
    7 th9
    3 th8

    Their side:
    12 th11
    3 th10

    I can provide photos if necessary. Their bases are all weak in defence except the top base and they all have wardens.

    Our clan is losing morale, why play fairly if itís a guaranteed loss? We are maxers yet we face engineered bases every war. They literallly have 12 th11ís, with the top th11 being max and then all of the others having weak defences and max attacks. They also use power potions.

    The only way to compete is to play like them. Rush to th11 and then just use power potions and max offence

    One of the most saddening points is that our clan teaches our members and friends to max each town hall before upgrading, its the advice we have always given. The members relied on this which we told them. Now, if you do that, you lose.

    We have always played with that method, yet now we cannot win unless we start new accounts and engineer. All of the members who followed our advice to max town hallís are all in the same situation. Discouraged and put down.

    We can no longer compete.
    Last edited by DragonXzP; January 13th, 2018 at 08:40 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    311
    Hello and welcome to the forums! First off, this post belongs here: https://forum.supercell.com/forumdis...p/66-Clan-Wars

    Secondly, most of us will tell you that not enough info is provided. If you do decide to share screenshots of what the bases look like, be sure to not show any names.

    Thirdly, we could also look at your roster to see if there are any bases that the mm had a hard time with. This doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing but having an extra set of eyes, from someone on the outside looking in, could help. We have a lot of specialists here that could provide some insight.

    Lastly, not everything appears what they seem. The actual war may look bleak on paper, but you could have just ran into an extremely rushed clan that's trying to use engineering as a way to hide their bad attacking skills. So don't give up yet! Give it all you got! You might be surprised by the results.

    Hope all this helps! Good luck with the war! Feel free to post the results when it's over 👌

  3. #3
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Parking lot of Grateful Dead show
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by DragonXzP View Post
    Three wars in a row, our matchups have been like this, or similar.

    Our side:
    5 th10
    7 th9
    3 th8

    Their side:
    12 th11
    3 th10

    I can provide photos if necessary. Their bases are all weak in defence except the top base and they all have wardens.

    Our clan is losing morale, why play fairly if it’s a guaranteed loss? We are maxers yet we face engineered bases every war. They literallly have 12 th11’s, with the top th11 being max and then all of the others having weak defences and max attacks. They also use power potions.

    The only way to compete is to play like them. Rush to th11 and then just use power potions and max offence

    One of the most saddening points is that our clan teaches our members and friends to max each town hall before upgrading, its the advice we have always given. The members relied on this which we told them. Now, if you do that, you lose.

    We have always played with that method, yet now we cannot win unless we start new accounts and engineer. All of the members who followed our advice to max town hall’s are all in the same situation. Discouraged and put down.

    We can no longer compete.
    Is maxing ethical?

  4. #4
    Forum Veteran xXXCHRISXXx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    1,938
    Quote Originally Posted by DBlaze View Post

    Secondly, most of us will tell you that not enough info is provided.
    OP provided enough information for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by DragonXzP View Post
    and they all have wardens.
    Doesnít matter what the defense levels or totals are. Offense wins this game. If theyíre all packing wardens... yeah enough was provided for me to get the gist of it.

    OP, the thing about this forum, youíll be required to provide dna, your mother maiden name, fathers motherís name and so on before you can say anything about a mismatch. For some reason a lot of folks here act as though this isnít happening on an everyday basis. Youíre better of just stating you have a mismatch and leaving it at that. When you start including th numbers people freak out and want more info. In their eyes no one can judge a mismatch other than them.

  5. #5
    Make A Wish
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    1,110
    Quote Originally Posted by DragonXzP View Post
    I can provide photos if necessary. Their bases are all weak in defence except the top base and they all have wardens.

    Our clan is losing morale, why play fairly if it’s a guaranteed loss? We are maxers yet we face engineered bases every war.
    How are you facing engineered bases EVERY war if you are a true maxer clan? I am going to guess you have a few X.5s in your lineup?

    If their bases are weak, what is preventing you from getting a tie?

    You don't seem to understand the difference between unfair and unethical.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    218
    A lot of people come on here to complain about "unfair", "unethical", "horrible match".yada yada yada............when fresh spawns come on here, it's obviously a viable complaint. sure they have .5 bases sure they have slightly engineered bases, sure they have a couple of low town halls at the bottom. It's called a CLAN WAR! why wouldnt you include members of your clan to enjoy and compete? I guess people are complaining about the wrong thing. the actual complaint is a hidden one.

    WHY IS IT THIS WAY WHEN IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE?

    OP, I am on your side as well as many others. don't let this forum make it out that the horrible match ups are your fault.

  7. #7
    Pro Member stealthmtn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Wherever "sneak peak" is being improperly used...
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by Ripple1972 View Post
    Is maxing ethical?
    Maxing isnt inherently ethical, its just that every other progression is unethical.

    [sarcasm]
    IGN: Sneak Peak; TH10.5 - Lvl 196; 1200+ War *s
    40/41/10 BK/AQ/GW [last updated 11/27/17]

    Quote Originally Posted by Ripple1972 View Post
    As self appointed overlord, please stop trying to use logic in all SC discussions.

  8. #8
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    109
    War matchmaking is completely broken. To all the forum people pointing the finger back at the OPs, you must have Stockholm Syndrome. +1000 xXXCHRISXXx . You cannot allow clans to have TH10 or TH11 with one max troop decide the wars period!
    Last edited by JuicemanClash; January 13th, 2018 at 10:58 PM.

  9. #9
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Parking lot of Grateful Dead show
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by JuicemanClash View Post
    War matchmaking is completely broken. To all the forum people pointing the finger back at the OPs, you must have Stockholm Syndrome. +1000 xXXCHRISXXx . You cannot allow clans to have TH10 or TH11 with one max troop decide the wars period!
    Has SC taken hostages? Is that ethical?

  10. #10
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    109
    It seems they have taken psychological hostages yes. No it is not ethical.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •