Clan War Matchmaking Improvements

[mludwig89]

Matched today, definitely not fixed.

We have 7 th11s. Mostly max, last one is a later stage 10.5.

Enemy has 13 th11s, 8 Eagles, last eagle has th10 point defenses. Their #9 has mostly max point defenses, max infernos but no eagle. Their th11 in the number 10 spot is about 2 weeks into th11 but has lvl7 loons and lvl 7 Warden. But the ones in the 20th, 21st, and 24th spot are swinging a full th11 laloon army. Severely rushed defenses and just the one max army.

It's just a stupid matchup. Give one team 26 th11 attacks, the other 14. Give the same team a defensive advantage.

Their really just is no other way to level matchmaking but stick a minimum point on all townhall levels.
And stop overweighting the th11s that have max'ed everything out. They are just one player. They can only attack twice. You can't run miners, hogs, laloon, bowitch, etc. at the same time.

Why give players who are extremely rushed with one max army a huge advantage?

they have not claimed to fix this yet.

[mludwig89]

just make a minimum weight for each th level...

what do you do with the people that have already upgraded?

[Prince1999]

I don't know if they are trying the new mm in silence, but, surprisingly, we had a very equated match up in our current war.

Matched today, definitely not fixed.

We are a maxer clan with zero X.5 or in any way engineered bases. Just matched with a very engineered clan.

TL;DR Us: 3xTH9, 9xTh8, 3xTH7. Them: 1xTH10, 6xTH9, 8xTH8. NOT FIXED YET

what do you do with the people that have already upgraded?

Those already upgraded would receive the minimum weight just as everyone else. This would be a painful change at first, I agree. However, after discussing this issue here and on other boards for over two years, I now agree that it is the only answer.

This would be unfair to rushers who did not build all defenses or offense as they went, you will say? To which I answer, wait til you see what the proposed system is going to do with those friends and family rusher clans. Those poor souls are about to be locked in a cage with the worst of the engineers. That, my friend, is not fair...not even slightly fair. The proposed minimum weight would be rough at first, but at least it would be something that they could eventually recover from. We have rehabbed many, many rushers.

[Adz93]

We have 1 th10 with 30/30 heroes and lvl 3 infernos. 2 10s who just moved from 9 and a few near max 9s. No engineered bases at all.

we just matched a clan with 4 max th10s and there 7/8/9 were engineered 11s with max troops. We do 10v10 wars and how can we possibly win that?

matchmaking is worse than ever at this moment in time

[Ripple1972]

We have 1 th10 with 30/30 heroes and lvl 3 infernos. 2 10s who just moved from 9 and a few near max 9s. No engineered bases at all.

we just matched a clan with 4 max th10s and there 7/8/9 were engineered 11s with max troops. We do 10v10 wars and how can we possibly win that?

matchmaking is worse than ever at this moment in time

That is why SC announced they would fix it.
I'm 100% confident that filthy engineers will be Punished and matches will be fair, 100% of the time.

[OnyxDS]

I'm 100% confident that filthy engineers will be Punished

What about the engineers with an acceptable level of personal hygiene?

[VickyAdok]

I find no issues getting matched against engineered bases. If my opponent has an advantage on offence, I would have an advantage for his low defence as well. Players complaining about engineered bases with level 1 cannons n level 45/45/20 heroes Please don't say you couldn't 3 star that base. 😂😂😂 My clan has been matched against engineered clans. We won some, we lost some.
I suggest SC should implement a system similar to BH where players MUST have all their defences (with specific minimum defence levels per TH level) before they can move to the next TH. Don't let players with engineered bases participate in wars until they meet the requirements. This will definitely prevent Engineering. BH is the best example we have.

[myavatarisupsidedown]

I find no issues getting matched against engineered bases. If my opponent has an advantage on offence, I would have an advantage for his low defence as well. Players complaining about engineered bases with level 1 cannons n level 45/45/20 heroes Please don't say you couldn't 3 star that base.  My clan has been matched against engineered clans. We won some, we lost some.
I suggest SC should implement a system similar to BH where players MUST have all their defences (with specific defence levels as per TH level) before they can move to the next TH. Don't let players with engineered bases participate in wars until they meet the requirements. This will definitely prevent Engineering. BH is the best example we have.

This won't happen, they already said that they don't want to invalidate any playstyle.

[VickyAdok]

This won't happen, they already said that they don't want to invalidate any playstyle.

Is it necessary to have different playstyles for the same game? The way MM works is like I get matched against a kid with iron gloves in a boxing ring. And I cry when I lose 😂😂😂.
Why do I have to face it? Ban the iron gloves n let the kid grow.

[ChiefTuk]

What about the engineers with an acceptable level of personal hygiene?

Clean engineers is an onyxmoron.