Page 66 of 241 FirstFirst ... 1656646566676876116166 ... LastLast
Results 651 to 660 of 2408

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Clan War Matchmaking Improvements

  1. #651
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    219
    CW must have war selection like ex.

    50v50 10th11 20th10 and 20th9-fix
    Or
    50v50 you deside what th you put in

    40v40 5th11 15th10 20th9
    Or
    40v40 any th lvl etc.

    What did you think?

  2. #652
    Super Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    847
    I apologize if this has already been addressed, but I don't have the time to wade through a 66 page thread.

    Have the matchmaking improvements been implemented yet?
    Last edited by bigf1973; August 3rd, 2017 at 03:23 PM.

  3. #653
    Forum Champion cnaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    5,295
    Quote Originally Posted by bigf1973 View Post

    Have the matchmaking improvements been implemented yet?
    No, they have not.

    Level: 187 | TH10 | IGN: cnaf11

    retired

  4. #654
    Pro Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    I'm not a pie you eat, I'm the pie that eats you. Nomnomnomnom.
    Posts
    741
    Matchmaking is still awful. My clan with 3 th11s, one of them near max, was matched up against a clan that had none. I'm glad you guys are finally doing something about this more directly.
    Last edited by FearElemental; August 3rd, 2017 at 06:08 PM.

  5. #655
    Pro Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by iBork View Post
    Yes and no. The parameters of the game are the parameters of the game. Meaning, a clan is composed of too many variables to make war match be equal across the boards. You can lessen the abusive defenseless engineering. But most are under the impression that MM can be modified to give fair wars to clans that have opted to max a TH as they move up. THIS, will never happen. It can't.

    Engineering is the ONLY way to NOT get unfair wars. A maxed based is perfectly balanced per the game. A non maxed maxed base is not. There are non maxed bases in the game. <------- this is why.
    To add to this, i'd say the ratio of maxed bases to non maxed bases is about 5% to 95% so sc better be very carfull with whatever they do

  6. #656
    Forum Veteran DarthPat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Skeletal Circus
    Posts
    1,686
    Quote Originally Posted by Superfinch30 View Post
    Well, on that war record thing, I will disagree with MisterOZ.

    Purely because....how could that thinking apply to the opponent?
    We were on a 5 streak, them on 4.

    Is 5 the magic number where they start allowing big weight disadvantages? Cos the clan on a 4 streak found themselves in an 'un-losable' match, which does rather go against the point they're making.
    I would have to agree here. My clan has had 5 win streak many times, but, we can't seem to get #6. Always a mismatch. We are currently on a 5 win streak and yet another horrible matchup.

    Us: 2 th10s, 5 th9s, 3 th8s.
    Them: 3 th10s, 3 th9s, 1 th11 sitting at #6, 2 th8s, 1 th7.

    Ridiculous
    Goodbye Forums. It's been fun!

    Thanks to DragonX101 for the awesome sig!

    |STATS|


  7. #657
    Forum Elder SuperStorm103's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Warring!
    Posts
    2,781
    Can say that the MM 2.0 is not rolled out yet. If it was, I'm walking away. Our new match is not much different then what the old MM would have deemed acceptable.
    DeathStorm-10|22/23|2148*|FireStorm-10|17/20|2178*|SuperStorm-9|13/15|2147*
    DragonStorm-9|8/8|1529*|PerfectStorm-9|8/10|1428*|BrainStorm-10|10/16|1452*

  8. #658
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperStorm103 View Post
    Can say that the MM 2.0 is not rolled out yet. If it was, I'm walking away. Our new match is not much different then what the old MM would have deemed acceptable.
    Coming off a nice even war in which we lost (in fact, we had 3 even matches in a row), we are back to a terrible match vs a completely engineered clan. We might still win, because their TH11's look incompetent, but it's still not fun seeing 6 TH11's vs our 1.

    When are they going to roll this out?
    Last edited by mbear78; August 3rd, 2017 at 08:20 PM.

  9. #659
    Forum Elder SuperStorm103's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Warring!
    Posts
    2,781
    Yeah, sounds about right, coming of a second loss to another engineered clan who had 5 th11's to our 2 and a 9 win streak (we had a streak of 0), we are facing a clan with 6 th11's to our 3 and they are on a 3 win streak. We of course are now on a 2 loss streak. They have the same amount of defense (if you don't count the th11 at the bottom of the map with 1 cannon and lvl 4 hounds and lvl 7 loons and of course a warden), but twice the top shelf offense. Here's to hoping they are bad attackers!
    Last edited by SuperStorm103; August 3rd, 2017 at 08:51 PM.
    DeathStorm-10|22/23|2148*|FireStorm-10|17/20|2178*|SuperStorm-9|13/15|2147*
    DragonStorm-9|8/8|1529*|PerfectStorm-9|8/10|1428*|BrainStorm-10|10/16|1452*

  10. #660
    Millennial Club URaTOWELL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,080
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthPat View Post
    I would have to agree here. My clan has had 5 win streak many times, but, we can't seem to get #6. Always a mismatch. We are currently on a 5 win streak and yet another horrible matchup.

    Us: 2 th10s, 5 th9s, 3 th8s.
    Them: 3 th10s, 3 th9s, 1 th11 sitting at #6, 2 th8s, 1 th7.

    Ridiculous
    5 is our magic number too
    IGN: YOU'RE A TOWEL! CLAN LEADER:TEAM AMERICA
    CLAN LEVEL17Th11LVL231 HIGHEST CUPS 5611
    BH7 4555



Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •