War matchups are getting worse we have had an absolute guts full of it, last war three th11's to our none! (one down in tenth amongst our th8's) it three stared our top two by the way this absolute crud I no longer want to press the war search button of fear of what we will get. You can say what ever you want but supercell can very easily fix this problem but refuse to do so.
All I can say to posts like these is LOL... The information you are giving here, (ie. three TH11's to our none) is irrelevant information without more details. Secondly there is no easy fix, that is clear and I've been saying it for months. Doesn't mean they shouldn't continue working on it, but it's not an easy fix.Originally Posted by COASTALVIKINGS
You know... this isnt a bad idea. I mean, an engineered base can easily give up 3 stars yet gain 6 in clan wars. If there is an offset that would be a 6:6 then it wouldnt be such a lopsided matching. I still think there should be a forfeit/surrender/decline option upon matchmaking that allows either/both clan to decline the war matchup within the first 30 mins after matching. I actually think this will be the best way to deal with engineered clans because no one will want to war against them and it will take the fun out of creating lopsided bases that allow you to ♥♥♥♥ your opponent. Just my opinion.
I'm sorry you cannot understand it but it is as clear as day to me. The other team has 6 dragon barfs that will completely wipe out their top 6 no matter how skilled his "not 11s" are.
Under what circumstances could a TH11 in 10th spot with a defensive weight of a TH8 who can three star the top two bases (TH10s) in the opposing lineup be a fair match. I think to be fair the information provided is sufficient to determine the unevenness of the matchup.
It's not an easy fix by any stretch but it's very easy to go back to something that was better you would think. Only that would require SC to admit that they got it wrong and to my recollection, that has never happened!
Communication Failure 101 : Companies refuse to be transparent and explain what went wrong, rather than owning up to things and making them right.
Last edited by NightsWatchMB; September 22nd, 2017 at 09:03 PM.
Wanted to follow up this post.... We completely forfeited this war 0:45. That said. Their #13 3 starred our 1 and 2. With that being accomplished, why would we even bother participating. 2 Awful Matches back to back and we are taking rest of week off to try and start fresh on Sunday morning. Waste of an entire week of wars... SMH
Last edited by Wdk935gsx; September 22nd, 2017 at 09:01 PM.
I will lay it out for you :
They had three th11 max Laloon freeze army spell capacity moderate heroes 15 warden enough to spam three star our top two guys who were solid th10' so they had an easy perfect war, our only hope was to get a draw and their number one was a th11 with Infernos but no eagle ..... So our number one two stared him a three was always going to be a stretch. Of coarse it's an easy fix matchups should be townhall for townhall where is the complication?
Oh yeah when they banned steroids in the Olympics was there people saying oh but we won't be able to win without out our advantage?? Same deal you engineered to gain an unfair advantage remove the advantage let them find a way to win fairly....
Your th8 start at 10? Run bigger wars. each overpowered base is 10 percent of 10v10, but 2.5% on 40v40.
Meanwhile, in the builder base, a tired Battle Machine operator limps home. He is bruised by giant cannon balls. His spine is compressed by crushers. His hair and beard is singed by roasters. He pours three fingers of Old Tennessee, and slumps into a rocking chair. He stares morosely at at an empty rug in front of a cold fireplace. A single tear escapes his left eye.
Thank you for providing slightly more information, still not enough to make an informed decision as to whether the war was fair or not, but I hope you understand that by just saying we had no x number of th11's and they had y number of th11's it doesn't tell us anything.
As a matter of fact, in our last war we were doubled in the number of Th11s against us vs. our th11s. Guess what, we won. So that's why I laugh anytime someone makes a post just like you did. Because the number of th11s is irrelevant without more information in the war.
As for your easy fix... Again, as it's been pointed out hundreds of times on these forums, just matching th for th is a terrible idea. Why you ask? Because all it does is create a new form of engineering whereby only max bases would be allowed in war, and while that may suit you just fine, you would be in the minority.
I think that matchmaking still needs to be improved. However, posting incomplete information, (as I've said before), does very little to validate the claims of unfair wars. Superstorm does a tremendous job of outlining war matchups and giving knowledgable assesments of a war's "fairness". You should check out his posts.
