Page 124 of 241 FirstFirst ... 2474114122123124125126134174224 ... LastLast
Results 1,231 to 1,240 of 2408

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Clan War Matchmaking Improvements

  1. #1231
    Forum Elder PapaTroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,504
    Folks hate to break ranks with the pity-party but just ran our fifth war new era and got a very even matchup. Us 2x11, 2x10, 9s on down. Them 1x11, 3x10, 9s on down. They have more infernoes. We have better heroes. We have one engineered 11 in the lower ranks. They have 2 engineered 10s in the lower ranks.

    This war will be decided by well executed attacks and good target selection .

    May the best clan win.

  2. #1232
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    93
    After 4 match ups of war in my clan I'd say it's working on more even match ups. My first wasn't it was against an engineered clan but we had an 8.5 in the war. Next war we took out the .5 and got closer but they were still roster engineering. Last 2 wars we have gotten almost completely fair. They both had engineers at the bottom but pathetic engineers. We are currently on a 8 win streak so not sure if thats messed up or not. Current team we are facing has 2 extra th9s both very low weight. Two th9 engineers at the bottom not very good. They have 2 max th10s up top vs our 2 early th10s but im sure has more to do with their low weight from the defenseless engineers.

  3. #1233
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaTroll View Post
    Is it uneven, yes. But is it the most even match between clans seeking a 40-40 match at 5pm on a Friday night? Is it better than a 16 hour search?
    NO.... I would happily wait as long as it takes for an even match. Its far better than wasting 2 days with a terrible match.

  4. #1234
    Pro Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by mbear78 View Post
    NO.... I would happily wait as long as it takes for an even match. Its far better than wasting 2 days with a terrible match.
    This ^^^ a million of this!

  5. #1235
    Sqwook
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Holps View Post
    It's going to be pretty pointless posting angry comments about MM without the numbers behind it. If this eventually achieves the desired results there are going to be engineers on here raging about MM and it will be hard for us filthy maxers to see the wood for the trees.
    Agree! Much better to walk away from the game! Found a much better one! Thanks for the memories SC. it's a shame you couldn't keep my interest.

    Collectors and storage are out. Can't use resources anyway because I have nothing to spend them on. No longer interested in sitting in clouds. Disinterested in smashing opponents for 8 wars in a row then having a ridiculously unfair matchup in the opponents favour.

    All the best everyone!

  6. #1236
    Forum Elder PapaTroll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2,504
    Quote Originally Posted by Sqwook View Post
    Disinterested in smashing opponents for 8 wars in a row then having a ridiculously unfair matchup in the opponents favour.

    All the best everyone!
    "Smashing" opponents 8 wars in a row is good but if they win it is because of a bad match?

    Here is the basic problem. Everyone wants an advantage in war. But only one side can win every war. You are asking for a system that gives everyone the advantage, and no one loses. Elsewhere in this thread is a "complaint" that his clan used to always win, but since the new MMA went live he had 3 wars in a row decided by the tie-breaker because of unfair matchup. That is right. If he doesn't win by 5 stars then it is unfair.

    We have plenty of stories of cans being placed at a disadvantage by the new MMA. Far fewer about clans getting a decided advantage, so I guess that just never happens. All based on the four or five wars we have each seen, so few it is statistically meaningless.

    What we need is hard data as a starting point for discussion. I estimate there are between 30k and 50k active clans engaged in war. that means about 200k - 500k wars fought since new MMA went active. Does Supercell have some data on these wars? Percentage of wars decided by 5 or more stars, before and after new MMA adjustments would be a strong indicator. Percentage of wars decided by one star or tie is another good indicator. Hard data is a good starting point for informed, intelligent discussion of whether the MMA is improving or hurting matches.

  7. #1237
    Millennial Club PrincessKeys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    1,449
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaTroll View Post
    "Smashing" opponents 8 wars in a row is good but if they win it is because of a bad match?

    Here is the basic problem. Everyone wants an advantage in war. But only one side can win every war. You are asking for a system that gives everyone the advantage, and no one loses. Elsewhere in this thread is a "complaint" that his clan used to always win, but since the new MMA went live he had 3 wars in a row decided by the tie-breaker because of unfair matchup. That is right. If he doesn't win by 5 stars then it is unfair.
    I don't see anyone asking for an "advantage". I see people asking for equal matchups. If I am in the top position in war as a th9, I don't want my "hardest" choice to be a maxed 8. In the same way, I don't want to be the bait for a th11. I don't want to smash lower ths and I don't want 11s smashing me. Translated: I want the win to be based on my skill of attack rather than spamming high level troops.

  8. #1238
    Forum Champion StormHeart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Philippines via Memphis, Tn. USA
    Posts
    5,344
    We matched to our fifth war after the update tonight. Two wars were bad matches but I looked at our own bases after the two bad matches.

    I had four TH8s I was playing my own games with. :P Not engineered but were .5s. I added their missing defenses and three wars in a row were close matches after that. It seems to have helped to balance my own bases. I also suggested our TH9s get their xbows.

    It does seem that .5s will increase the likelihood that you will get engineers. I had taken it too far perhaps too. It's still too early to know for sure. I was ready to just engineer but I noticed the engineers we were getting had all of their defenses, just at low levels. It could all go bad again fast but it seems to be better if we don't play our own games.

    Signature Banner from ClashofHolmes
    Stormy Knights Leader
    Join Stormy Knights
    Join us on Discord
    Player Tag: ​#20RRP9UQ8
    My post is opinion unless I specifically state it's a fact.

  9. #1239
    Millennial Club Uggster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Bournemouth, UK
    Posts
    1,093
    To be fair.... I started war yesterday and the match up was strangly mainly lower lvs being some kind of half breed mutated engineered bases. Like they suddenly scrambled defences like they knew their pure engineering days wernt the same no more n rushed upgraded defences to some how snap back to reality, oops there goes gravity defenceless war base days are over.

  10. #1240
    2222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    21,364
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaTroll View Post
    "Smashing" opponents 8 wars in a row is good but if they win it is because of a bad match?

    Here is the basic problem. Everyone wants an advantage in war. But only one side can win every war. You are asking for a system that gives everyone the advantage, and no one loses. Elsewhere in this thread is a "complaint" that his clan used to always win, but since the new MMA went live he had 3 wars in a row decided by the tie-breaker because of unfair matchup. That is right. If he doesn't win by 5 stars then it is unfair.

    We have plenty of stories of cans being placed at a disadvantage by the new MMA. Far fewer about clans getting a decided advantage, so I guess that just never happens. All based on the four or five wars we have each seen, so few it is statistically meaningless.

    What we need is hard data as a starting point for discussion. I estimate there are between 30k and 50k active clans engaged in war. that means about 200k - 500k wars fought since new MMA went active. Does Supercell have some data on these wars? Percentage of wars decided by 5 or more stars, before and after new MMA adjustments would be a strong indicator. Percentage of wars decided by one star or tie is another good indicator. Hard data is a good starting point for informed, intelligent discussion of whether the MMA is improving or hurting matches.
    Many people want even matches with equal useful offense and defense so the result is determined by the attacking and designing skill of the players. That would mean if your clan is much more skilled than the other, you destroy them by several stars with an even match. It would mean if both clans have similar skill the match is very close.

    As far as the stories about clans getting an advantage, I have seen those too, but naturally see more complaints about a bad match. Part of that is expected given people are more likely to complain than to compliment, especially after gaining hope from SC that the matchmaker would be fixed. Part of it is because those who are consistently getting an advantage might not want it to change. They will just keep on keeping on. Personally, I don't want a big advantage or disadvantage. I would much rather have 10 even matches than have 10 uneven matches, even if 8 of them are in my favor.

    I care little about the % of wars decided by 5 or more stars as that tells me almost nothing. Percentage of wars decided by 1 star or less tells me more, but still isn't determinative of an even match, especially when "recent war success" is a factor.

    Contact SC here. Click here for how trophies are calculated. An idea to improve legends here. I wish max players had a separate loot bank as described here. Caution, I often discuss for the sake of discussion and enjoy having my opinion challenged (or approved of) even when I care little about the actual issue. My balance wish: get rid of tornado trap, make it a decoration.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •