
Originally Posted by
PapaTroll
"Smashing" opponents 8 wars in a row is good but if they win it is because of a bad match?
Here is the basic problem. Everyone wants an advantage in war. But only one side can win every war. You are asking for a system that gives everyone the advantage, and no one loses. Elsewhere in this thread is a "complaint" that his clan used to always win, but since the new MMA went live he had 3 wars in a row decided by the tie-breaker because of unfair matchup. That is right. If he doesn't win by 5 stars then it is unfair.
We have plenty of stories of cans being placed at a disadvantage by the new MMA. Far fewer about clans getting a decided advantage, so I guess that just never happens. All based on the four or five wars we have each seen, so few it is statistically meaningless.
What we need is hard data as a starting point for discussion. I estimate there are between 30k and 50k active clans engaged in war. that means about 200k - 500k wars fought since new MMA went active. Does Supercell have some data on these wars? Percentage of wars decided by 5 or more stars, before and after new MMA adjustments would be a strong indicator. Percentage of wars decided by one star or tie is another good indicator. Hard data is a good starting point for informed, intelligent discussion of whether the MMA is improving or hurting matches.