Page 8 of 36 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 352

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: Uneven match!!...ENGINEERED BASES

  1. #71
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Darian[Supercell] View Post
    It's more about being transparent about changes being implemented.
    So....I read that as....we are changing things, but we'll tell u this time. Given u haven't ever published the matching algorithm, but slip things like gold storage weights in war=war weight, etc...we discover on our own. Engineering is simply that, adapting to the written or unwritten rules of the game.

    Notice BB avoids minimaxes by requiring buildings? It's basically an acknowledgement you don't want them. It is a way of being transparent, by requiring them.

    The transparency, though hasn't been direct and upfront, that's the missing piece.

  2. #72
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    13
    The best fix would be to change the MM so that clans with engineered accounts would match against each other. Maybe even have two different MM pools, one for engineered clans and other for normal clans. No one would be forced to drop defences on their engineered accounts, but they always could once they get tired of going against other similarly engineered accounts. There probably would need to be some kind of warning on both war participant selection list and somewhere on the actual account stating that you don't have enough defences to qualify as a "balanced" account.

  3. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    666
    Posts
    1,609
    Quote Originally Posted by nerfedname View Post
    I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

    If it becomes incumbent upon the player base to maintain multiple accounts, at various stages of upgrade progression, both offensively and defensively, JUST to compete on equal footing in clan wars then the game is in a heap of trouble. The average player and the masses won't stand for that. They won't make a second engineered TH11 account, they'll simply move on and find a better game.

    I suspect many have already done so including, to some extent, myself.
    agreed, my clan decided to quit wars because of engineering and, consequently, we took a break from the game (because war is the most important feature of the game for us)

    I won't allow myself to get hyped from what darian said, I don't want to get frustrated with supercell anymore, but it would definetely be great if they found a way to remove engineering from this game

  4. #74
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    763
    Quote Originally Posted by larpo View Post
    The best fix would be to change the MM so that clans with engineered accounts would match against each other. Maybe even have two different MM pools, one for engineered clans and other for normal clans. No one would be forced to drop defences on their engineered accounts, but they always could once they get tired of going against other similarly engineered accounts. There probably would need to be some kind of warning on both war participant selection list and somewhere on the actual account stating that you don't have enough defences to qualify as a "balanced" account.
    But then you would be effectively splitting the MM pool and creating smaller MM pools which from what I have read on here would make the MM job even more difficult. Seems lioke a decent amount of savvy programmer/developer tech people have all agreed that a small MM pool will result in more mismatches, but maybe I am not correct in that assumption.

    Also what is a balanced base? There is nothing in-game or stated by SC that I am aware of that defines the term balanced. I just created a new thread on this subject in this subforum because I beleive it is an interesting topic of conversation that likely may not have a black and white answer.

  5. #75
    Pro Member Shunyata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by xXXCHRISXXx View Post
    The opposite of smart is what? Doesn't matter much of what you said but more of what you implied. It'll be hard to adapt to an ever changing algorithm, good luck.
    Fair enough, I used an improper adjective. I apologize. I don't think non-engineers aren't smart. I do however think a lot of the ones on this forum have a hard time adapting.
    TH11 with 65 marble walls and 45/45/20 royals

  6. #76
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,076
    Have only commented on these types of threads a few times, as we just don't match engineers often (and probably because our win streaks are never long), but it seems the majority of those perceived 'bad' draws do involve wardens. I know the ones we get do. Just can't be that hard to spot those among the 8 and 9 level weights and match them accordingly. One can argue any way he wants, but in a game that constantly balances and rebalances in order to supposedly dodge easy game play at the top, it only makes sense that heavy balancing at the mm level should happen more often. In a game that promotes defending being just as important as attacking, one should at least have to make an honest effort to do so or face a consequence...not be rewarded.

    TH13...level 254...75/75/50/20...gg 2 bil...ee 2 bil...hh 45 mil...atb 6032

  7. #77
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    al-Mamlaka al-Arabiyya as-Suudiyya
    Posts
    3,811
    Just like every other time there are adjustments, smart people - regardless of their play style - will adjust accordingly..

    I am excited to see what happens just for ensuing forum activity about whether it was enough. I will be surprised to see the wholesale elimination of engineering using the BH model but then I have been wrong before...

  8. #78
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    560
    Quote Originally Posted by Darian[Supercell] View Post
    It's more about being transparent about changes being implemented.
    I have been asking for the reinstatement of Clan War FAQ for almost a year now, it would be a step closer to being transparent no?

  9. #79
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,614
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogalian View Post
    It sucks for those of us who have put time and effort into building balanced bases matching to engineers at the moment.

    You will have the ability to "catch up" defenses. We don't have the ability to remove ours.

    Players that are 2 years into the game whatever level deserve fair wars.
    I agree, it does suck, we faced the same thing before learning to adapt to the matchmaking rules of the game in order to stay competitive. You may not have the ability to remove defenses, but you do have the ability to create new engineered accounts, recruit engineered accounts or engineer your main accounts, you just choose not to.

    If engineering is not how the game was intended, which I'm sure it wasn't, and everyone should max out their bases for ultimate performance in wars, then this should have been fixed long before so many people have worked so hard on their engineered accounts.

  10. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Parking lot of Grateful Dead show
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogalian View Post
    It sucks for those of us who have put time and effort into building balanced bases matching to engineers at the moment.

    You will have the ability to "catch up" defenses. We don't have the ability to remove ours.

    Players that are 2 years into the game whatever level deserve fair wars.
    I totally agree. So, when I realized the advantage engineering had (12 months ago) I stopped being balanced. I am guessing you didn't see any engineering over the past 2 years into the game.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •